Примеры использования Denounced the optional protocol на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
F Jamaica denounced the Optional Protocol on 23 October 1997, with effect from 23 January 1998.
However, be necessary to explain in a footnote that Trinidad andTobago had denounced the Optional Protocol and had re-acceded on the same day subject to a reservation.
D Jamaica denounced the Optional Protocol on 23 October 1997, entering into effect from 23 January 1998.
As explained in para. 6.2 of the Committee's Views, on 26 May,1998 the State party denounced the Optional Protocol and immediately reacceded with the reservation.
Note: Jamaica denounced the Optional Protocol on 23 October 1997, with effect from 23 January 1998.
During the period under review,the Committee continued to consider a communication that had been submitted before Trinidad and Tobago denounced the Optional Protocol under article 12 of the latter.
Trinidad and Tobago again denounced the Optional Protocol on 27 March 2000, with effect from 27 June 2000.
Moreover, under article 12, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol, the Committee is still considering communications from one State party(Trinidad and Tobago) that denounced the Optional Protocol, in 2000.
As the country had denounced the Optional Protocol, he wished to know what remedies existed.
During the period under review, the Committee has continued to consider communications that had been submitted before the States parties concerned had denounced the Optional Protocol under article 12 of the latter.
Guyana denounced the Optional Protocol to the Covenant on 5 January 1999, with the denunciation taking effect as of 5 April 1999.
Following the Committee's decision in case No. 845/1999(Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago) of 2 November 1999, declaring the reservation invalid,Trinidad and Tobago again denounced the Optional Protocol on 27 March 2000, with effect from 27 June 2000.
H Guyana denounced the Optional Protocol on 5 January 1999 and reacceded on the same day, subject to reservations, with effect from 5 April 1999.
Following the Committee's decision in case No. 845/1999(Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago) of 2 November 1999, declaring the reservation invalid,Trinidad and Tobago again denounced the Optional Protocol on 27 March 2000, entering into effect from 27 June 2000.
I Guyana denounced the Optional Protocol on 5 January 1999 and re-acceded on the same day, subject to a reservation, with effect from 5 April 1999.
Following the Committee's decision in case No. 845/1999(Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago) of 2 November 1999, declaring the reservation invalid, Trinidad andTobago again denounced the Optional Protocol on 27 March 2000, entering into effect from 27 June 2000.
Trinidad and Tobago denounced the Optional Protocol on 26 May 1998 and re-acceded on the same day, subject to a reservation, with effect from 26 August 1998.
Although as of the date of this report there are 98 States parties to the Optional Protocol, the Committee is competent to consider communications concerning 100 States,including two former States parties that have denounced the Optional Protocol pursuant to article 12.
G Trinidad and Tobago denounced the Optional Protocol on 26 May 1998, and re-acceded on the same day, subject to reservations, with effect from 26 August 1998.
Moreover, under article 12(2) of the Optional Protocol the Committee is still considering communications from two States parties(Jamaica and Trinidad and Tobago)that have denounced the Optional Protocol, such communications having been registered before denunciation took effect.
E Trinidad and Tobago denounced the Optional Protocol on 26 May 1998 and reacceded on the same day subject to reservations, with effect from 26 August 1998.
During the period under review, the Committee continued to consider three communications(cases Nos. 793/1998 Pryce v. Jamaica, 797/1998 Lobban v. Jamaica and 798/1998 Howell v. Jamaica)that had been submitted before Jamaica denounced the Optional Protocol under article 12 of the latter.
While it was regrettable that Trinidad andTobago should have denounced the Optional Protocol, he wished to emphasize that that denunciation did not change a single letter of its obligations under the Covenant.
Moreover, under article 12, paragraph 2, of the Optional Protocol the Committee is still considering communications from two States parties(Jamaica, andTrinidad and Tobago) that denounced the Optional Protocol, in 1998 and 2000 respectively, such communications having been submitted before denunciation took effect.
They are Jamaica, which denounced the Optional Protocol on 23 October 1997, with effect from 23 January 1998, and Trinidad and Tobago, which denounced the Optional Protocol on 27 March 2000, with effect from 27 June 2000.
He hoped that Trinidad andTobago would take steps to shed its reputation as the only State party to have denounced the Optional Protocol, and that it would lead the countries of its region and beyond in prompt reporting, paying full attention to Covenant principles and compliance with international human rights treaties.
F/ Trinidad and Tobago denounced the Optional Protocol on 26 May 1998 and reacceded on the same day subject to reservations,with effect from 26 August 1998. Guyana denounced the Optional Protocol on 5 January 1999 and reacceded on the same day subject to reservations, with effect from 5 April 1999.
Thus, the State party chose to denounce the Optional Protocol.
In the present case the State party exercised its prerogative to denounce the Optional Protocol.