Примеры использования Divergent views were expressed на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
With regard to the final form, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed by the member States on these suggestions.
In the discussion of the note by the Commission, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed concerning the retention or deletion of paragraph 2.
In regard to medium- orlong-term approaches, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed on the inclusion of refugees and stateless persons.
During each Committee meeting, divergent views were expressed by Member States.
Divergent views were expressed concerning the use of the term"green economy.
As to the distribution of seats among geographic groups, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed regarding possible gaps in the institutional framework.
In response to questions regarding the scope of the words"its terms", divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed concerning the draft decision put forward by the Commission.
Some States discussed whether weapons should be addressed and divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed regarding the duration of the session of the Special Committee.
However, at the last plenary meeting of the Commission,held on 1 December 1994, divergent views were expressed on this issue.
Divergent views were expressed at the meeting regarding the content of its final statement.
As regards the form which the final product of the Commission's endeavour should take, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed regarding the reference to“terrorism” in the definition of crimes.
However, at our organizational session held on 1 December 1994 divergent views were expressed on the question of dates and duration of the 1995 substantive session.
Divergent views were expressed on the existence of regulatory or governance gaps.
With regard to the General Assembly's request to the Commission to study all aspects of the application of the Noblemaire principle with a view to ensuring the competitiveness of the common system, divergent views were expressed.
Divergent views were expressed concerning the advisability of including estoppel within the topic's scope.
In discussing possible incentives and disincentives,the following proposals were presented and divergent views were expressed; therefore, further consideration of these proposals is warranted.
Divergent views were expressed as to whether the Commission should continue its consideration of this topic.
In the course of the deliberations, divergent views were expressed concerning the scope of the subject under consideration.
Divergent views were expressed regarding the suggestion that the Commission consider the recognition of States.
In this context, divergent views were expressed regarding the applicability and level of ceiling rates in the United Nations scale of assessments.
Divergent views were expressed concerning the various proposals to add new items to the existing agenda.
As in previous years, divergent views were expressed under this agenda item with regard to the role of the Meeting of States Parties in relation to the discussion of substantive matters.
Divergent views were expressed on the need for a definition of the terms"territory" and"frontier.