Примеры использования Draft guidelines should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
There was general agreement that the draft guidelines should be binding in some way.
The draft guidelines should make clear the objects to be protected: natural and human environments.
The first part of the report describes what the key principles of the draft guidelines should be.
The CHAIRPERSON said that the draft guidelines should be instructive but should not preach.
The draft guidelines should not alter the general regime of the Vienna Conventions, or depart from the general practice of States.
Some delegations expressed the view that the set of draft guidelines should be streamlined and consolidated into a more concise list.
The draft guidelines should include options that the Committee could reflect on and discuss.
It had also been agreed at the inter-committee meeting that any State party wishing to prepare reports using the draft guidelines should be allowed to do so.
Mr. Glele Ahanhanzo said that the draft guidelines should remain an internal, not an official, document.
The draft guidelines should be submitted to the General Assembly through the Advisory Committee prior to promulgation of the appropriate administrative instructions.
Speakers also noted that the activities of both transnational corporations and domestic corporations could affect the enjoyment of human rights,and so the draft guidelines should apply to both.
For that reason, the draft guidelines should be adopted immediately, with the understanding that they could be improved on in time.
However, given the intrinsic relationship between the natural environment and the human environment(which includes not only human health in a narrow sense but also natural vegetation and crops, materials andhistorical heritage), the draft guidelines should include both.
The question remained as to whether the draft guidelines should be adopted as an official, and hence public, document of the Committee.
He recalled the mandate of the Expert Group and expressed the hope that it would be able to present clear proposals initially to the Bureau and eventually to the Working Group of the Parties sothat the latter would be in a position to present draft guidelines, should it so decide, for possible adoption at the second meeting of the Parties Almaty, Kazakhstan, May 2005.
Any comments andproposals for additions to these draft guidelines should be passed on to the members of the task force or sent to the secretariat by 1 November 1999.
The draft guidelines should therefore address the question of the legal status and effect of such declarations, which her delegation considered to be unilateral interpretations.
With regard to draft guideline 2.4.1,there was no reason in principle why the draft guidelines should stipulate which persons were entitled to make simple interpretative declarations.
The draft guidelines should reaffirm, and not contradict, the rules and principles under existing regimes relating to air pollution, ozone depletion and climate change.
Others believed that while comments should be encouraged, the draft guidelines should not be officially circulated until the working group, the SubCommission and the Commission had agreed to do so.
The draft guidelines should be supplemented by a more elaborate provision for peaceful settlement of disputes, drawn from article 33 of the Convention on the Law of the Non-navigational Uses of International Watercourses.
The experts discussed the draft text and decided that the draft guidelines should be split into two sets, one related to compliance with multilateral environmental agreements and the other related to enforcement and environmental crime.
The draft guidelines should be normative principles providing helpful guidance to States and promoting the progressive development and codification of international law on the protection of the atmosphere.
A number of developing country representatives stressed that the draft guidelines should take into account the particular circumstances and needs of developing countries, and there was general agreement that the guidelines should be regularly updated.
The draft guidelines should therefore distinguish clearly between the two types of interpretative declaration, stating explicitly in each guideline on the subject whether both types were covered, or only one.
Some approaches taken in the draft guidelines should be brought into line with that regime, for example, the procedure described in draft guideline 2.1.8.
The expert believed the draft guidelines should apply to all companies. However, it would be desirable to include definitions of transnational corporation, national company, etc..
Mr. MAVROMMATIS said that as the draft guidelines should contain general requests for information and not interpretations of specific articles, the first sentence of paragraph 11 should be deleted.
The Working Group noted that the draft guidelines should reflect the need for consultation and cooperation on setting joint and harmonized targets in the case of transboundary waters.
It was emphasized that the draft guidelines should be appropriately streamlined and made fully consistent with existing international legal instruments and efforts of other relevant intergovernmental organizations.