Примеры использования Existing nuclear arsenals на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Third, we need to move forward in reducing existing nuclear arsenals.
Existing nuclear arsenals are capable of destroying our civilization and all life on Earth.
Such a treaty, as and when it is concluded and enters into force,will not eliminate existing nuclear arsenals.
However, existing nuclear arsenals and the many gaps in the non-proliferation regime remained as threats to world peace and security.
It should also immediately cease all nuclear testing and dismantle all its existing nuclear arsenals.
We no more wish existing nuclear arsenals to be sustained than we will tolerate parallel development of such arsenals by additional States.
In the statement delivered by the representative of the United Kingdom,mention was made of the dangers that existing nuclear arsenals continue to pose.
Various efforts have been made to reduce the existing nuclear arsenals and to strengthen the nuclear non-proliferation regime at the unilateral, bilateral and multilateral levels.
It is necessary to halt the spread of nuclear weapons and to significantly reduce andultimately eliminate existing nuclear arsenals.
However, the existing nuclear arsenals are still greatly disproportionate to any actual or conceivable threats. The nuclear disarmament process must therefore continue unabated.
We know that a treaty prohibiting the production of fissile material, a“cut-off” treaty,is not directly intended to reduce existing nuclear arsenals.
A number of initiatives have been taken at the unilateral,bilateral and multilateral levels aimed at reducing existing nuclear arsenals and at further strengthening and reinforcing the nuclear non-proliferation regime.
Nuclear-weapon States parties to the NPT should realize that the impasse at the Review Conference was,to a large extent, due to the perception that there has not been any sign of real resolve to eliminate existing nuclear arsenals.
While New START is a bilateral Treaty,its entry into force is an important step in drawing down existing nuclear arsenals, with a view to achieving their total elimination.
Therefore, no more nuclear tests are necessary for them, and still they can exercise their influence as much as they want on the international stage as nuclear Powers by depending on their existing nuclear arsenals.
Malaysia calls upon all nuclear-weapon States to refrain from undertaking measures to either, develop new and more sophisticated nuclear weapons,qualitatively improve existing nuclear arsenals, or adopt new strategic defence doctrines, which may set out the rationale for first use of nuclear weapons, and lower the threshold for their use.
Taken together, these developments remind us all just how fragile the nuclear non-proliferation regime is, unless anduntil it is buttressed by more determined efforts to reduce existing nuclear arsenals, Mr. Zahran.
Besides the existing nuclear arsenals that should be significantly reduced by all five nuclear-weapon States that are signatories to the Non-Proliferation Treaty and States that have yet to accede to the Treaty and that hold nuclear weapons as mentioned in paragraph 5 below, there are pressing issues, and Japan has the following views on such issues.
It is of paramount importance that these commitments be honoured,the programme of action accomplished and, consequently, the existing nuclear arsenals eliminated within a specified time-frame.
The Committee condemns the lack of political will on the part of the nuclear Powers, which have not fulfilled the commitment to conclude a treaty for the elimination of nuclear weapons andwhich continue to develop their existing nuclear arsenals.
In conjunction with the START process, the other nuclear-weapon States should commit themselves,at very least, to not increasing their existing nuclear arsenals and to further intensifying their current efforts in reducing them.
Though the NPT remained the basis for the nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament regime, the Treaty had failed to prevent the spread of nuclear weapons and the appearance of new de facto nuclear States,partly due to a lack of progress in implementing the obligations to reduce existing nuclear arsenals.
From the IAEA perspective, the universal application of strengthened safeguards, andeffective verification of compliance with agreements to eliminate existing nuclear arsenals, would provide a sound basis for verifying a world free from nuclear weapons.
Some would stress the need to prevent proliferation to volatile regions, while others would argue for universal compliance with and enforcement of the Treaty; some would say that the spread of nuclear fuel cycle technology posed an unacceptable threat, while others would counter that access to the peaceful uses of nuclear technology must not be compromised; and some would depict proliferation as a grave threat,while others would argue that existing nuclear arsenals were a deadly danger.
It would build upon the successes we have achieved so far: securing a permanent extension of the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty; freezing North Korea's nuclear program;cutting existing nuclear arsenals by putting the START I Treaty into force; persuading Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan to give up their nuclear weapons and to reach agreements with Russia that now mean that both our nations no longer target our missiles at each other.
On the other hand, the continued failure to bring to a successful conclusion negotiations leading to the progressive elimination of nuclear weapons,as well as plans to modernize existing nuclear arsenals, jeopardize the viability of the Treaty.
Threats from the use or threat of use ofnuclear weapons persist and considerable uncertainty remains over the size of the existing nuclear arsenals and the availability of nuclear weapons materials.
Fifth, an unconditional international instrument should be developed to provide the necessary safeguards for non-nuclear States against any threat ordanger that might result from the use of existing nuclear arsenals against them.
The indefinite extension of the NPT removed the element of urgency from obligations under article VI of the Treaty,which may legitimize existing nuclear arsenals and perpetuate their further modernization.
Fourth, it is necessary to develop a universal, unconditional and legally binding instrument that provides the necessary security assurances for nonnuclear-weapon States against any threats orrisks that might result from the use of existing nuclear arsenals against them.