Примеры использования Formulation of objections на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Formulation of objections.
Section 2.6 Formulation of objections.
Formulation of objections to reservations.
Draft guidelines 2.6.5 to 2.6.15 concerned the formulation of objections.
Joint formulation of objections to reservations entered by other parties;
These rules would seem to be transposable mutatis mutandis to the formulation of objections.
Formulation of objections to reservations and interpretative declarations-- the"reservations dialogue.
Five provisions of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions are relevant to the formulation of objections to treaty reservations.
Draft guideline 2.6.6 on joint formulation of objections was modelled on draft guidelines 1.1.7 and 1.2.2.
Draft guideline 2.6.9 transposed the procedural rules concerning the formulation of reservations to the formulation of objections.
The Commission has noted that, in the main, the formulation of objections to reservations is practised by a relatively small number of States.
It is clear that some rules of procedure applicable to the formulation of reservations cannot be transposed to the formulation of objections.
The procedural rules concerning the formulation of objections are not notably different from those that apply to the formulation of reservations.
Five provisions of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions are relevant to the formulation of objections to treaty reservations.
The point was also made that the formulation of objections could also be approached on a case-by-case basis, taking into account both principles and practical considerations.
In fact this report constituted a complementary section to the eighth report on the formulation of objections to reservations and interpretative declarations.
Her own Government approached the formulation of objections on a case-by-case basis, taking into account both principles and practical considerations.
Accordingly, the Commission considered it prudent simply to take note in the Guide to Practice of this procedural parallelism between the formulation of reservations and the formulation of objections.
As this period is the one ordinarily provided to contracting States and organizations for the formulation of objections, it seems legitimate to provide it for objections to late reservations as well.
In the light of these observations, for the purpose of defining and categorizing acceptances,it is probably sufficient to indicate in the heading of the section of the Guide to Practice on the formulation of objections.
The majority of the draft guidelines relating to the formulation of objections and the withdrawal and modification of objections proposed in the eleventh report were approved without objection by the Commission.
It was clear from the travaux préparatoires, however, that in principle the withdrawal of objections ought to follow the same rules as the withdrawal of reservations,just as the formulation of objections followed the same rules as the formulation of reservations.
It begins with an examination of questions relating to the formulation of objections, which were already dealt with to some extent in the eighth and ninth reports on reservations to treaties A/CN.4/535/Add.1 and A/CN.4/544.
Sir Humphrey Waldock's first report, which introduced the"flexible" system in which objections play a role that is, if not more important, then at least more ambiguous,contained an entire draft article on procedural issues relating to the formulation of objections.
Subject to transposing sections B(Formulation of acceptances of reservations)and C(Formulation of objections to reservations), the explanation for which was already given in the eighth report by the Special Rapporteur, the following should be noted with respect to this framework.
Mr. Martinsen(Argentina) said that one of the major achievements of the Guide to Practice on Reservations to Treaties was the systematic analysis of State practice regarding express ortacit acceptance of reservations and the formulation of objections to reservations.
As the non-maintenance of an express acceptance could be likened, on the basis of its potential effects or even its modalities, to the formulation of an objection, it would seem logical to make the exercise of that capacity conditional on observance of the 12-month period prescribed for the formulation of objections in guideline 2.6.13, which was implicitly referred to in draft guideline 5.14.
It was only logical that Sir Humphrey Waldock's first report, which introduced the"flexible" system in which objections play if not a more important then at least a more ambiguous role,contained an entire draft article on procedural issues relating to the formulation of objections.
Although the provisions of the Vienna Convention do not go into detail on the issue of withdrawal of objections, it is clear from the travaux préparatoires that, in principle, the withdrawal of objections ought to follow the same rules as the withdrawal of reservations,just as the formulation of objections follows the same rules as the formulation of reservations.
The brevity of the reference in paragraph 1 of the guideline to"the relevant guidelines" is warranted by the fact that it would be difficult if not impossible to give an exhaustive list in the guideline itself of all the guidelines applicable to the formulation of objections.