Примеры использования Gross human rights violations and serious на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Under international law it was uncontested that victims of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law had the right to reparations.
Other armed groups, which took advantage of the security vacuum that followed the redeployment of FARDC units to combat M23, since May 2012,were also responsible for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Protecting witnesses in trials relating to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law may require certain particular elements.
States need to consider developing comprehensive witness protection programmes coveringall types of crimes, including gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
M23 combatants were indeed responsible for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, including summary executions, rape and child recruitment.
Люди также переводят
From the experience of truth commissions,it is possible to conclude that the right to the truth applies to all gross human rights violations and serious breaches of international humanitarian law.
M23 had committed gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, as had other armed groups, such as the Democratic Liberation Forces of Rwanda(FDLR) and the Lord's Resistance Army(LRA), operating in the eastern region of the country.
This practice could also be meaningful in the context of national orinternational prosecutions or investigations for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
M23 committed gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, as did other armed groups, taking advantage of the security vacuum left since May 2012 following the redeployment of units of the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of the Congo(FARDC) to combat M23.
However, there are few examples of witness protection programmes operating at the national level, which relate to trials for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Recognizing the importance of preserving historic memory related to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law through the conservation of archives and other documents related to those violations.
It could also amount to a violation of the obligation of States to provide judicial assistance to investigations that deal with gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
The right to know the truth about gross human rights violations and serious violations of humanitarian law is recognized in some international treaties and instruments, in the national legislation of several countries, in national, regional and international jurisprudence and by many international and regional intergovernmental organizations.
In addition, in the context of operations against M23, members of the Congolese defence and security forces allegedly committed gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, including mass rape.
The right to the truth about gross human rights violations and serious violations of humanitarian law is an inalienable and autonomous right, recognized in several international treaties and instruments as well as by national, regional and international jurisprudence and numerous resolutions of intergovernmental bodies at the universal and regional levels.
Ms. Zack(United States of America) said that the non-binding instrument in question embodied respect for the rule of law and the principle of accountability for gross human rights violations and serious violations of the law of armed conflict.
In addition to political will, overcoming the legacies of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law will require a whole host of interventions(including broad constitutional and legal reforms, development programmes, rebalancing structural inequalities, overcoming patterns of exclusion and marginalization, etc.) with which transitional justice measures ought to be coordinated.
The present report will focus on selected current problems of State-sanctioned truth commissions in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, and proposes responses to increase their effectiveness.
Taking also into account Council resolution 10/26 of 27 March 2009 on forensic genetics and human rights, in which the Council recognized the importance of the utilization of forensic genetics to deal with the issue of impunity within the framework of investigations related to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
This lack of implementation leads to a situation that can be appropriately characterized as a scandal:most victims of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international law receive, in fact, little to no reparation, despite progress at the normative level.
The updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity(E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1)(hereinafter Set of Principles)reaffirm the inalienable right to know the truth vis-à-vis gross human rights violations and serious crimes under the international law.
The study concludes that the right to the truth about gross human rights violations and serious violations of human rights law is an inalienable and autonomous right, linked to the duty and obligation of the State to protect and guarantee human rights, to conduct effective investigationsand to guarantee effective remedy and reparations.
He also analyses selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods and proposes responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Underlining the fact that, when designing and implementing strategies, policies and measures to address gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, the specific context of each situation must be taken into account with a view to preventing the recurrence of crises and future violations of human rights, to ensure social cohesion, nation-building, ownership and inclusiveness at the national and local levels and to promote reconciliation.
Practice at international tribunals and courts shed some light on the protection of witnesses, victims and others involved in trials of crimes under their jurisdictions,more specifically crimes relating to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
Acknowledging also the report of the Office of the High Commissioner on the right to the truth and its conclusions regarding the importance of the protection of witnesses within the framework of criminal procedures relating to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, as well as on issues relating to the elaboration and management of archive systems to guarantee the effective implementation of the right to the truth.
Encourages United Nations agencies, Member States and civil society organizations to exchange experiences and good practices on the subject of the right to the truth, with a view to improving the effectiveness of relevant mechanisms and procedures empowered to seek information, assert facts and effectively reveal the truth about what has happened in the aftermath of gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law;
Acknowledging also the report of the Office of the High Commissioner on the right to the truth(A/HRC/12/19) and its conclusions regarding the importance of the protection of witnesses within the framework of criminal procedures related to gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law, as well as on issues related to the elaboration and management of archive systems to guarantee the effective implementation of the right to the truth.
The aim of the report is"to determine the need to develop common standards and promote best practices that would serve as guidelines to States in protecting witnesses and others concerned with providing cooperation in trials for gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.
The report lists key activities undertaken by the Special Rapporteur from August 2012 to July 2013, and analyses selected challenges faced by truth commissions in transitional periods,while proposing responses to strengthen the effectiveness of those mechanisms in addressing gross human rights violations and serious violations of international humanitarian law.