Примеры использования Have not abolished на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Article 6, paragraph 2, begins with the words:"In countries which have not abolished the death penalty.
In countries that have not abolished the death penalty, the death sentence may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law.
Article 6, paragraph 2, begins with the words:"In countries which have not abolished the death penalty.
In particular, in States that have not abolished the death penalty, capital punishment may only be imposed for intentional killing and may not be mandatory in such cases.
Article 6, paragraph 2, makes an exception for States parties that have not abolished the death penalty.
Люди также переводят
In the second place, it constitutes- for those States which have not abolished the death penalty- a limitation on its application, in so far as it may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Covenant applies specifically to countries that have not abolished the death penalty.
In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not. .
The Second Optional Protocol to the Covenant was drafted and adopted so as toencourage States parties that have not abolished the death penalty to do so.
In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the- ment rendered by a competent court.
Article 6, paragraph 2, of the Covenant provides that"in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
Article 6, paragraph 2, refers to the death penalty, which may be carried out only pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court andonly for the most serious crimes in countries which have not abolished it.
The International Convention on Civil andPolitical Rights stated that, in countries that have not abolished the death penalty, the death sentence may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
The authors argue that re-imposition of the death penalty and its application to them is inconsistent with the first sentence of article 6, paragraph 2,permitting the imposition of the death penalty in States"which have not abolished the death penalty.
Pursuant to article 6(2) of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights, in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, a sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
In his comments on the State party's submission, author's counsel argues that whereas article 6 of the Covenant does foresee the possibility of the imposition of the death penalty, article 6, paragraph 2,applies only to countries"which have not abolished the death penalty.
Article 6, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights stipulates that,"in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
In countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the present Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide". resolution 2200 A(XXI), annex, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, part III, article 6, paragraph 2.
Statement(3) is manifestly incorrect in the light of the opening words of article 6, paragraph 2:"In countries that which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed.
In the light of the provision of article 6 of the Covenant,requiring States parties that have not abolished the death penalty to limit it to the most serious crimes, the Committee considers the imposition of that penalty for crimes of an economic nature, for corruption and for adultery, or for crimes that do not result in loss of life, as being contrary to the Covenant.
In accordance with article 6, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,in States that have not abolished the death penalty, it may only be imposed for the"most serious crimes.
Recalling also that article 6, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights states that in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes in accordance with the law in force at the time of the commission of the crime and not contrary to the provisions of the Covenant and to the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.
In regard to restrictions on the use of the death penalty, the Special Rapporteur finally wishes to recall article 6, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights which stipulates that,“in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes”.
Unfortunately, the Covenant precludes this approach,since article 6 permits the death penalty in countries which have not abolished it, provided the stringent conditions laid down in paragraphs 2, 4 and 5 and in other provisions of the Covenant are met.
It has neither abolished the death penalty nor introduced a moratorium for crimes such as drug offences that do not meet the threshold of"most serious crimes" which are the only ones to which, under international human rights law, the death penalty should be applied,in countries that have not abolished the death penalty art. 6, para. 2, of the Covenant.
In addition, article 6(2) of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights states that in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, this sentence may be imposed only for the most serious crimes, pursuant to a final judgement rendered by a competent court.
In addition to violating rights to life, privacy and non-discrimination, application of the death penalty in these circumstances violates article 6 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights,which provides that, in countries that have not abolished the death penalty, a"sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
It is worth emphasizing that article 6, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Civil andPolitical Rights provides that,"in countries which have not abolished the death penalty, sentence of death may be imposed only for the most serious crimes.
It submits that with respect to the imposition of the death penalty, article 6, paragraph 2, specifically permits its application in those countries which have not abolished it, but requires that it be imposed in a manner that respects the conditions outlined in article 6.
Special attention should be paid in this regard to the system of minimum punishments and obligatory detention applicable to certain offences andto capital punishment in countries which have not abolished it, bearing in mind reports that this punishment is imposed and carried out more frequently against persons belonging to specific racial or ethnic groups.