Примеры использования He also maintains на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
He also maintains an open-door policy.
In his communication dated 27 August 1999, he also maintains that he was the victim of a violation of article 7 and article 10, paragraph 3, of the Covenant.
He also maintains that he was ill-treated in the Serpukhov city prison.
He also maintains that PPRA officers are not applying the correct legal standard in law.
He also maintains consultative and collaborative relations with the African Union Senior Representative in MINURSO.
He also maintains that the remedy proposed by the Netherlands is ineffective under article 2, paragraph 3, of the Covenant.
He also maintains that the conditions of detention to which he was exposed amount to a violation of article 16 of the Convention.
He also maintains his claims under article 14, paragraph 5, since the Supreme Court has failed to eradicate the subsisting contradictions in his case.
He also maintains that after the 2008 Mumbai attacks there was a great wave of detentions, false accusations and torture taking place against large parts of the political class.
He also maintains that he has not been interviewed in person by an agent of the Government with responsibility for assessing his protection claims at any stage of the proceedings.
He also maintains that the Office of the Prosecutor-General and the Supreme Court refused to review the decision of the court of cassation in violation of his rights under article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant.
He also maintains that since he was not properly notified of his rights,he did not know that he had the right to insist on having another defender.
He also maintains that the case law in question cannot be applied to his situation because the aims invoked to justify the limitation of freedom of religion in the cases in question are not at issue in this instance.
He also maintains that the protocols which were not signed by him or his lawyer, as confirmed by the State party, should not have been admitted as evidence according to the domestic criminal procedure.
He also maintains that the ineffectiveness of the above-mentioned remedy was confirmed by the recent case of Vladislav Kovalev, who was executed while the Supreme Court was conducting a supervisory review of his case.
He also maintains that the ineffectiveness of the above-mentioned remedy was confirmed in the recent case of Vladislav Kovalev, who was executed while the Supreme Court was conducting a supervisory review of his case.
He also maintains that the absence of the protocol from his arrest, as attested to by the State party, confirms that he was not informed of his rights upon arrest in violation of his rights under article 9, paragraph 2, of the Covenant.
However, he also maintains that the existence of these legal provisions does not in itself invalidate allegations of human rights violations made by the 221 individuals interviewed for his reports between November 2011 and July 2012.
He also maintains that the Swiss pension was not calculated in accordance with the bilateral Agreement but in accordance with Swiss domestic legislation, and, since it is correct, is not disputed.
He also maintains close contact with the donor community to mobilize support for Liberia and takes part in a number of discussions and forums in the United States and elsewhere to advocate support for peacebuilding in Liberia.
He also maintains high-level contact with parties to conflict and Member States, particularly through the Security Council, as well as troop-, police- and finance-contributing countries, in the implementation of Security Council mandates.
He also maintains that the applicant had no reason to mention his political activities in Switzerland during the asylum procedures and had always been questioned about his past and about facts which could have supported his application for asylum.
He also maintains that the administrative supervision under which he was placed, which involved constant supervision by eight different authorities, accompanied by acts of intimidation, meant that lodging a complaint would have placed him in danger.
He also maintains that the previous case of extradition of a Canadian had been presented without any information that might allow comparison between the two cases and in no way diminished the existence of serious and personal risks of torture in the case of the complainant.
He also maintains professional contacts with health care authorities, organizes hospital acquisitions in key hospitals, includes drugs in regional benefit or target program, conducts tender work, interacts with distributors, holds major events: conferences, round tables.
He also maintains, in this connection, that, had he been tried before 10 February 1998,he would have been sentenced to 15 years' imprisonment, which was the gravest punishment provided by law at the time of the alleged commission of the crimes except for the death penalty, which the State party made a commitment not to apply in his case.
He also maintained contact with the multinational Stabilization Force SFOR.
At the same time he also maintained a medical practice.
He also maintained that Baitullah had not been killed but rather was in ill health.
He also maintained close collaboration with key United Nations organizations, including OHCHR, UNHCR and the Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs.