Примеры использования Impartial plebiscite на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Pakistan was waiting for a positive reply from India to its invitations to hold a free and impartial plebiscite.
Security Council resolution 47(1948) had promised a free and impartial plebiscite in Indian-occupied Jammu and Kashmir, to be conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
The time had come to ensure free andfair expression of the will of the people of Kashmir through an impartial plebiscite.
Its political status was to be determined through a free and impartial plebiscite under United Nations auspices as mandated by the Security Council and accepted by India and Pakistan.
It is about the exercise of the right to self-determination by the Kashmiri people through a free,fair and impartial plebiscite under United Nations auspices.
Its political status was to be determined through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations as mandated by the Security Council and solemnly accepted by both India and Pakistan.
No electoral exercise conducted in Jammu andKashmir by India could substitute for a free and impartial plebiscite as mandated by the Security Council.
It was regrettable that,decades after Security Council resolution 47(1948) had promised a free and impartial plebiscite to determine the status of Jammu and Kashmir, the people of those regions remained deprived of their right to self-determination and continued to face widespread human rights violations.
Sir Owen Dixon, the United Nations Mediator,was constrained to report that India was insisting on conditions that made the holding of a free and impartial plebiscite impossible.
Despite the provisions of Security Council resolutions 47(1948) and80(1950), which called for a free and impartial plebiscite to be conducted in Jammu and Kashmir under United Nations auspices, India had continued to deny Kashmiris the right to express their wishes freely and democratically.
United Nations resolutions clearly stated thatthe future of the State of Jammu and Kashmir should be decided through a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under United Nations auspices.
It should read the Security Council documents again: it should also go back and read the resolution of 5 January 1949 which solemnizes the agreement between Pakistan andIndia to make all necessary arrangements for holding a free and impartial plebiscite.
Moreover, no electoral exercise conducted by India could substitute for a free and impartial plebiscite mandated by the Security Council.
Withdraw its forces from the disputed State in accordance with the United Nations Security Council resolutions andclear the obstacles in the way of holding a free and impartial plebiscite in Kashmir;
No action had been taken on the request of the Security Council to organize a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
Contrary to what the representative of India had said, it was not a unilateralclaim because it appeared in the relevant resolutions of the Security Council, in which it was very clearly stated that the future of Kashmir would be decided in accordance with the wishes of the people of the Territory through an impartial plebiscite sponsored by the United Nations.
No electoral exercise conducted by India could replace an expression of the people's will through a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
Mr. Diyar Khan(Pakistan), in response to the remarks made by the representative of India under agenda item 67, asked how India could consider Jammu and Kashmir an integral part of its territory when the United Nations Security Council had adopted several resolutions that declared them a disputed territory between Pakistan andIndia and called for a settlement of that dispute through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.
Mr. Diyar Khar(Pakistan) reiterated that elections held by occupying Powers within the context of a foreign occupation oralien domination could not be an alternative to a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations, as promised to the people of Jammu and Kashmir by the Security Council.
Both India and Pakistan had committed themselves to abide by the decision of the Security Council allowing the people of Jammu andKashmir to determine their own future through the holding of a free and impartial plebiscite under United Nations auspices.
The crisis in Jammu and Kashmir could be resolved only through the implementation of the Security Council resolutions calling for a free and impartial plebiscite under the supervision of the United Nations to determine the will of the people.
There are Security Council resolutions- numerous Security Council resolutions- which mandate that the final disposition of the Jammu andKashmir dispute should be in accordance with the wishes of the people, through a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.
No electoral exercise conducted by India could replace an expression of the people's will through a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
Those refugees looked forward to the day when they would be able to return to their homeland andexercise their right to self-determination through a fair and impartial plebiscite, as mandated by the Security Council.
Moreover, the Security Council Resolutions had clarified that no electoral exercise conducted by the Indian authorities in Jammu andKashmir could substitute a free and impartial plebiscite under the auspices of the United Nations.
The Security Council has clearly pronounced, in resolutions 91(1951) and 122(1957),that any such action"would not constitute a disposition of the State" in accordance with the principle of a free and impartial plebiscite to be conducted under the auspices of the United Nations;
Security Council resolutions clearly determine that thefinal disposition of the State of Jammu and Kashmir will be made in accordance with the will of the people expressed through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
The United Nations Security Council also clearly pronounced, in resolutions 91(1951) and122(1957), that any such action"would not constitute a disposition of the State" in accordance with the principle of a free and impartial plebiscite to be conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
The relevant Security Council resolutions clearly determine that the final disposition of the State of Jammu andKashmir will be made in accordance with the will of the people, expressed through the democratic method of a free and impartial plebiscite conducted under the auspices of the United Nations.
Mr. KAMAL(Pakistan), speaking in exercise of the right of reply, said that the question of Jammu and Kashmir was the oldest unresolved issue on the agenda of the Security Council andthat its future was to be decided through a free and impartial plebiscite as mandated by Security Council resolutions.