Примеры использования It had paid на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It had paid the premiums for the period from 4 February 1989 to 4 February 1991.
In that sub-claim, the claimant asserted that it had paid the consignee of the goods.
In Jordan, the Agency requested the authorities to reimburse sales taxes it had paid.
It had paid the minimum amount required in order to avoid the application of Article 19.
UNAMID informed the Board that as at 7 October 2009, it had paid $4.11 million to the vendors.
Nonetheless, it had paid its assessed contributions in full, on time and without conditions.
Portugal still had partial payments outstanding for 2007, although it had paid its contribution for 2008.
The Government said it had paid the families of the victims compensation of 400,000 new pesos for each person killed.
The Panel finds that Fochi did not provide sufficient evidence of ownership of the Equipment or that it had paid for the Equipment.
It had paid special attention to its long-term programme of work and had identified and examined a number of topics for future consideration.
Lastly, he pointed out that although Mexico was contending with an unprecedented financial crisis, it had paid its contributions to the regular budget in full.
In 1997, it had paid over $6 million to the regular budget, and it was planning to pay $2.5 million by the end of 1998.
Georgia remained committed to meeting its obligations to the United Nations and it recalled that it had paid almost $7.8 million since 1996.
On 20 July 2009, the State party informed the Committee that it had paid the sum of 5.4 million Hungarian forints(approximately $28,000) to the author by way of compensation.
Georgia remained committed to meeting its obligations to the United Nations and it recalled that it had paid almost $7.8 million since 1996.
Sasref also did not demonstrate that it had paid the retainer to the two Dutch teachers nor did it adequately explain the origin of its obligation to do so.
Thus, KNPC accepted the risk of loss of the goods in transit, even thoughit may never have actually taken delivery of the goods for which it had paid.
It had paid proper attention to that risk, but did not judge it so grave as to justify depriving the four nations of their right to bring the issue before the General Assembly.
The buyer justified its partial payment for the goods on the grounds that it had paid the demurrage for the vessel's prolonged stay in the loading port, which should have been borne by the seller.
It had paid its assessed contributions in full, implemented the Host Country Agreement and addressed the Tribunal's needs through the Joint Facilitation Committee of Senior Representatives.
Mr. BORG-OLIVIER(UNMIK) thanked the Committee for the attention it had paid to the human rights situation in Kosovo and to UNMIK activity, and also thanked the Serb delegation for its preliminary statement.
Mr. Abdullah(Yemen) said that his delegation, was surprised and indignant that bureaucratic considerations had deprived it of the right to vote,despite the fact that it had paid the minimum contribution some 10 days previously.
Since May 2011 alone, it had paid over $2.2 billion in contributions to the regular budget, peacekeeping operations, the international tribunals and the capital master plan.
Samref provided a copy of the contract with the bus operating company together with proof that it had paid the full amount claimed of SAR 296,200 for the period from 13 January to 12 March 1991.
The Claimant alleges that it had paid rent in advance for its embassy premises for the period of the occupation of Kuwait but, due to the forced closure of the embassy as of 10 September 1990, it was deprived of the use of the premises.
The Tribunal informed the Board that since 1996 it had paid a cumulative amount in excess of $2.5 million to the Tanzanian Police and Prison Services($10 per day per officer) without having a formal agreement in place.
He added that the United Nations had therefore submitted a claim for reimbursement to the Government of Malaysia for legal expenses it had paid on behalf of the Special Rapporteur in connection with the proceedings in the four suits.
Despite the challenges involved, it had paid its contributions for the regular budget, the international tribunals, the capital master plan and peacekeeping operations in full in 2011, and had paid its regular budget and international tribunal contributions, and most of its peacekeeping contributions in 2012.