Примеры использования It to conclude на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee considered that, taken together,the circumstances required it to conclude that the author's own rights under article 7 had also been violated.
In paragraph 10 of resolution 947(1994), the Security Council expressed its concern that a status-of-forces Agreement has not yet been concluded, inter alia,by the Republic of Croatia with UNPROFOR and called upon it to conclude such an agreement without delay.
The material before the Committee does not permit it to conclude that the conduct of the judicial proceedings in the alleged victims' case suffered from such deficiencies.
In the case at hand, the author has not provided the Committee with sufficient information to enable it to conclude that the domestic remedies are ineffective.
Moreover, the authors have not submitted to the Committee sufficient or relevant information on the case law of the Spanish Constitutional Court relating to the rights protected under article 17,paragraph 1, which might enable it to conclude that the remedies would have been ineffective.
In these circumstances, the Committee is of the view that the facts before it do not allow it to conclude that the disappearance of Mr. Krasovsky was carried out by the State party itself.
Nevertheless, verification also allows it to conclude that, during the period referred to in this section, both the Government and URNG took some positive steps which amount to progress in complying with a number of commitments in the Comprehensive Agreement.
In these circumstances, the Committee was of the view that the facts before it did not allow it to conclude that the disappearance of Mr. Krasovsky was carried out by the State party itself.
The Group's investigations lead it to conclude that the lack of transparency in Côte d'Ivoire's business and financial services sectors provides the sanctioned individuals with an ideal environment in which to evade the United Nations assets freeze and travel ban.
The Committee further expressed the view that the author did not provide any evidence that would enable it to conclude that the assessment conducted was manifestly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
The Group's investigations lead it to conclude that the lack of transparency in Côte d'Ivoire's business and financial services sectors provides the three sanctioned individuals with an ideal environment to evade the United Nations assets freeze and travel ban.
In the light of these circumstances, the Committee considers that the facts before it do not permit it to conclude that Mr. Levinov's rights under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, have been violated.
The information available to the Government leads it to conclude that in Mali there are no funds or other financial assets or economic resources belonging to the individuals, groups or entities referred to in resolution 1390(2002), or funds derived from property owned or controlled, directly or indirectly, by them.
The Committee took into account the evidence provided by the author pointing to the State party's direct responsibility for Mrs. Amirova's death, butconsidered that the evidence did not reach the threshold that would allow it to conclude that there had been a direct violation of article 6.
In the Working Group's opinion,this provides sufficient grounds for it to conclude that there has been a violation of article 9, paragraph 3, of the Covenant and article 9 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
Leaving aside communication ACCC/C/2008/24 and its specific circumstances, and bearing in mind the explanations of the Party concerned regarding the applicable rules for calculating the time frames in Spanish law,the Committee has at present no evidence before it to conclude that the Party concerned is still in non-compliance with article 6, paragraph 3.
The Committee notes that the material on file does not lead it to conclude that the determination made by the domestic courts was arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
With regard to the author's allegations that he was denied a fair trial because the brother of one of the deceased was chief of the police station where he underwent his first interrogations, the Committee notes,first, that nothing in the documents before it leads it to conclude that these allegations were brought before the competent national authorities.
Therefore, the Committee has no elements at its disposal which would allow it to conclude that a violation by the State party of the provisions of the Convention has indeed taken place in this case.
In its decision on complaint No. 311/2007(M.X. v. Switzerland), concerning the complainant's allegation that his expulsion to Belarus would breach Switzerland's obligations under article 3 of the Convention,the Committee took note of the absence of sufficient evidence that would allow it to conclude that the complainant would face a foreseeable, real and personal risk of being tortured in his country of origin.
The Committee's review of the functions of these 12 posts led it to conclude that the establishment of all 12 posts for the Situation Centre is not warranted for the next budget period.
In the circumstances, and in the absence of any other pertinent information on file,the Committee considers that the facts before it do not permit it to conclude that the author's rights under article 14, paragraph 3(f), of the Covenant, have been violated.
The information before the Committee does not enable it to conclude that Nepal has established and maintained governmental policies sufficiently effective to prevent torture and to end endemic impunity in Nepal for perpetrators of acts of torture.
In the light of the above considerations, the Committee finds that the materials on file do not permit it to conclude that the author's rights under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, have been violated in the present case.
According to the State party,the above-mentioned permits it to conclude that the realization of the right to receive and disseminate information can be achieved exclusively in a lawful manner, i.e. in the framework of the existing legislation of a State party to the Covenant.
In these circumstances, the Committee was of the view that the materials before it did not allow it to conclude that the State party had misapplied the restrictions in article 12, paragraph 3.
The Committee notes that the material before it does not permit it to conclude that in this case, the appeal court failed to duly examine all facts and evidence of the case, as well as the first instance judgment.
In the light of the considerations in paragraphs 10.3 and 10.4, the Committee finds that the materials on file do not permit it to conclude that the author's rights under article 14, paragraph 1, of the Covenant, have been violated in the present case.