Примеры использования Negative effects of sanctions на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The negative effects of sanctions on human lives and property should, moreover, be reviewed continuously.
The time had come to establish a formal mechanism to alleviate the negative effects of sanctions on third States.
In addition, the negative effects of sanctions and their impact on the most vulnerable groups must be taken into account, as noted by the Secretary-General in his report A/55/1.
At that time, there was some speculation about"smart sanctions" to avoid the negative effects of sanctions on the mass of the population and confining them to the regime.
In addition, UNIDO's response to the expert group meeting's report calls forstrengthened regional cooperation and improved dialogue to reduce the negative effects of sanctions on third States.
The current efforts of the international community to minimize the negative effects of sanctions on both the targeted State and third States were to be applauded.
Moreover, through its support to the resident coordinator system, FAO collaborates closely withother development organizations and entities both within and outside the United Nations system in efforts aimed at alleviating the negative effects of sanctions to third States.
In recent years, however, there has been increasing concern about the negative effects of sanctions on vulnerable civilian populations, as well as over their collateral effects on third States.
The speakers called for greater attention to fundamental human rights principles, anddrew attention to the negative effects of sanctions on vulnerable groups.
It was only logical to consider carefully the negative effects of sanctions on third States before taking decisions in that regard and to incorporate economic impact assessments into the decision-making process.
It further recommended that the Committee should explore practical mechanisms for alleviating the negative effects of sanctions on vulnerable groups.
Given the complexity and seriousness of the negative effects of sanctions, the issue must be addressed in a wide-ranging manner and there must be an impartial analysis of proposals related to the imposition of sanctions.
Concerned Governments should consider undertaking more research and a review of the sanctions regime in order toidentify ways to avoid or mitigate the negative effects of sanctions and other measures on the Syrian population.
Sierra Leone favoured an in-depth study of possible measures to alleviate the negative effects of sanctions on third States, bearing in mind the needs created as a result of exceptional and unforeseen circumstances.
The programme authorized by the Security Council in its resolution 986(1995)is unique among all humanitarian assistance operations undertaken by the United Nations in that it seeks to mitigate some of the negative effects of sanctions being imposed on the recipient country.
UNICEF, for example, has been particularly active in assessing unintended negative effects of sanctions and, when necessary, cushioning children and other vulnerable groups from them.
It was recalled that in the past practice of the Council there had been instances(for example, in the case of Sierra Leone) where arrangements were made foreseeing that the Secretariat, upon request,would provide an assessment of the humanitarian needs and the possible negative effects of sanctions.
Support was therefore voiced for the various efforts andinitiatives aimed at minimizing the unintended negative effects of sanctions on such populations and third States while at the same time preserving their effectiveness.
Thus it was suggested, for example, that the Security Council should act, without delay, on any application made by a State, pursuant to Article 50 of the Charter, should make timely exemptions for humanitarian purposes, consider the costs suffered, in particular by developing countries as a result of sanctions, and should,on a regular basis, monitor the negative effects of sanctions.
At the same time,Slovenia failed to see how a comprehensive system to compensate for all the negative effects of sanctions, applied under Chapter VII, could be set up. A case-by-case approach seemed more realistic.
With regard to targeted sanctions, which had been mentioned by many delegations at the most recent session of the Special Committee, and without prejudice to the Security Council's margin of discretion,it should be recognized that targeted sanctions could reduce the negative effects of sanctions on the population of the affected State and on third States.
The increasing concern at the potential negative effects of sanctions regimes on vulnerable civilian populations prompted the Security Council to request assessments of the possible humanitarian implications of such coercive measures.
It was also observed that increased recourse to the use of sanctions in recent years had prompted the international community to consider ways of reducing the negative effects of sanctions on non-targeted States while at the same time safeguarding their effectiveness.
While sharing the concerns voiced by many States regarding the unintended negative effects of sanctions on civilian populations and third States, his delegation believed effective sanctions were a useful tool in the maintenance of international peace and security.
Moreover, the sovereign right of States to express their views on the implementation of such sanctions, on their impact on third States and on compensation for the negative effects of sanctions on third States that have been affected by their implementation is often impeded.
In its view,establishing meaningful criteria and procedures would have the effect of minimizing the negative effects of sanctions on third States and would also contribute to their effectiveness. Such effectiveness depended on the unreserved cooperation of third States.
My delegation fully agrees with the view of the Secretary-General on this issue, something of which he had earlier written in his millennium report(A/54/2000), that sanctions should be focused on targeted leaders to make them comply with the relevant Security Council resolutions andto alter their political behaviour, and that negative effects of sanctions regimes on the targeted people should be avoided.
Some representatives, however, struck a note of caution in this respect,pointing out that efforts to minimize the negative effects of sanctions on third States should not impair the effectiveness of the measures taken by the Security Council.
It welcomed the draft declaration submitted by the Russian Federation on the basic conditions and standard criteria for the introduction of sanctions and other coercive measures and their implementation. Tunisia believed that, pursuant to Article 50 of the Charter and in the spirit of the Millennium Declaration,the Security Council should, as a matter of urgency, take responsibility for alleviating the negative effects of sanctions and the cost they imposed on third States.
The call to reform the international sanctions regime is gaining more momentum within the Security Council andother United Nations bodies, because the negative effects of sanctions have compounded the suffering of the peoples of the countries subjected to them, in particular vulnerable groups such as children, women and the elderly.