Примеры использования Number of delegations suggested на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A number of delegations suggested that this paragraph should be deleted.
Or reparation through any other international arrangement, appropriate forms of reparation[,[including][such as] restitution,compensation and rehabilitation].A number of delegations suggested that the Statute should address the issue of reparations to victims and their families.
A number of delegations suggested the deletion of this article.
In respect of panellists from developing countries, a number of delegations suggested the establishment of a more effective and expeditious selection mechanism in order to ensure their participation.
A number of delegations suggested modifications and alternative options for the TAP.
In view of this, a number of delegations suggested that the report be tabled for noting only.
A number of delegations suggested to organize a workshop on market surveillance.
In this regard, a number of delegations suggested that the involvement of States Parties and NGOs would be important.
A number of delegations suggested additional amendments to the preliminary draft protocol.
As regards preparations in Western Sahara, a number of delegations suggested that UNHCR should increase the involvement of NGOs, and concert with the United Nations Development Programme and the World Bank on the longer-term reintegration needs of the returnees.
A number of delegations suggested that this provision be merged with the article on protection measures.
Although there was some support for the article, a number of delegations suggested that a specific provision relating to the meeting time of the Committee so as to allow it to carry out its functions under the protocol, as proposed in article 16 of document E/CN.6/1997/WG/L.1, was inappropriate and linked to resourcing of the proposed protocol.
A number of delegations suggested identifying shortcomings in the working methods of the Board in matrix form.
A number of delegations suggested that the list of treaties contained in article 22 could be supplemented.
A number of delegations suggested that the annual report and the report on the multi-year funding framework(MYFF) should be combined.
A number of delegations suggested that the Cooperative Mechanism should be viewed as an example of best practice for other regions.
A number of delegations suggested aligning the wording of paragraphs 5 and 8 with the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action.
A number of delegations suggested that the respective responsibilities of the New York and Geneva offices should be more clearly defined.
A number of delegations suggested that reception arrangements must also take into account the length of asylum procedures.
A number of delegations suggested that the implementation of the Guidelines could be best promoted by making them mandatory.
A number of delegations suggested that particular emphasis be placed on creating a climate receptive to asylum-seekers, to avoid racism and xenophobia.
A number of delegations suggested that, in the interest of making progress, attention should be focussed on short term solutions and practical measures;
A number of delegations suggested the commissioning of analytical and statistical data in order to produce a comprehensive view of the present social situation.
A number of delegations suggested that the financial crisis was a result of the change in donor funding trends, and did not reflect the Fund's efficacy.
A number of delegations suggested that'the environment' should be read to include human health or, alternatively, that the definition should include an explicit reference to human health.
A number of delegations suggested that consideration might be given to adding more analytical content to future reports, in addition to the description of relevant activities.
A number of delegations suggested that certain draft articles should be shifted elsewhere in the draft convention in order to place them within a more suitable or logical grouping of draft articles.
A number of delegations suggested using, in paragraph 5(a), the previously agreed language"racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance" instead of just"xenophobia.
A number of delegations suggested that the Parties should meet shortly after the entry into force of the Protocol, whereas others preferred holding the first meeting of the Parties in 2006.
A number of delegations suggested that in future, it might not be necessary to have a regular session in March, and they requested that the Board consider this possibility when examining its programme of work for 1998.