Примеры использования Party has not submitted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The State party has not submitted any observations on the author's comments.
Lastly, the author notes that the State party has not submitted observations on the merits.
The State party has not submitted any information that would justify the delays.
However, it regrets that the report was long overdue and that the State party has not submitted a common core document.
It notes that the State party has not submitted general information in the first part of the report, or in a core document.
Notwithstanding reminders dated 25 September 2000, and 11 October 2001,the State party has not submitted any observations or comments on the merits of the case.
The State party has not submitted any medical evidence or information concerning any official investigation of the alleged events.
The Committee reiterates its regret that the State party has not submitted a report since the submission of its initial report in 1983.
While welcoming the information provided by the delegation on the number of complaints relating to racial discrimination considered by the National Human Rights Commission of Korea,the Committee regrets that the State party has not submitted sufficient information regarding the nature and outcome of these cases art. 6.
It also notes that the State party has not submitted observations on this matter.
Noting that the State party has not submitted a core document, the Committee encourages the State party to submit a core document in accordance with the harmonized guidelines on reporting under the international human rights treaties, in particular those on the common core document, as adopted by the fifth inter-Committee meeting of the human rights treaty bodies held in June 2006 HRI/GEN.2/Rev.6, chap. I.
Those documents had been transmitted to the Committee in the context of a number of earlier communications,and the State party has not submitted copies of the said memorandums or specific comments on the present communication.
He further notes that the State party has not submitted any documentation in this regard and that the alleged complaint is not available in the public domain.
With regard to the trial in the court of first instance,the Committee finds it regrettable that the State party has not submitted detailed observations about the author's allegations that the trial was not impartial.
It is regretted that the State party has not submitted any report to the Committee since 1986, despite the resumption of the dialogue with the State party in 1993.
On the investigation into the misconduct and omissions committed during the preliminary investigation,the author regrets that the State party has not submitted a copy of the decision of 4 May 2010, and informs the Committee that he has not received any notification of such investigations.
The Committee regrets that the State party has not submitted a report to the Committee since it submitted its second periodic report in 1990(CCPR/C/26/Add.4) and considers that this represents serious disregard for article 40 of the Covenant.
It also notes that the State party has not submitted any specific observations on this matter.
The Committee notes that the State party has not submitted any information suggesting the non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, and therefore considers there to be no impediment to examining the communication under article 5, paragraph 2(b), of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee regrets that the State party has not submitted observations on the merits of the case under consideration.
The Committee regrets that the State party has not submitted observations on the merits of the case under consideration.
Furthermore, the Committee may note that the State party has not submitted any evidence contradicting the statements and evidence supplied by the author.
Moreover, the Committee notes that the State party has not submitted any objections on the admissibility of the communication, including with regard to the exhaustion of domestic remedies.
The Committee also regretsthe delay in the submission of the report, and that the State party has not submitted written responses to its list of issues(CAT/C/YEM/Q/2), nor has it responded to the letter of 21 April 2006, in which the Committee Rapporteur on follow-up to the concluding observations requested further information on Yemen CAT/C/CR/31/4 and Add.1.
What was the Committee to do when a State party had not submitted an initial report?
Two Parties had not submitted any data for 2010 under the Protocol on POPs.
Parties have not submitted views on the process for consideration of the communications.
Noted with regret that several Parties had not submitted their reports by the established deadline;
Thirty-three States parties had not submitted initial reports.
Of these, 36 States parties have not submitted their initial reports.