Примеры использования Party was requested на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 8 March 2006, the State party was requested to provide an update.
The Party was requested by the Secretariat to re-submit its national report through its official contact point.
In the Committee's note verbale of 21 July 2010, the State party was requested to provide clarifications and supporting documents.
The State party was requested to provide the authors with reparation, to include compensation.
In the light of the content of its submission of 24 May 2011, the State party was requested to provide updated information on 2 July 2012.
The State party was requested to provide clarifications in relation to the current status and whereabouts of Ms. Pelit.
On 27 November 1998, 22 September 2000 and24 July 2001, the State party was requested to submit to the Committee information on the merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide the authors with an effective remedy, including termination of their detention.
On 9 May 2006, 20 September 2006 and28 November 2006, the State party was requested to submit information on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide the author with an effective remedy, including a full reconsideration of the expulsion order.
On 2 June 2003, 30 October 2006 and31 May 2007, the State party was requested to submit information on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide that information by 1 January 1994 so that it might be considered by the Committee at its forty-fourth session.
On 1 May 2009, 18 August 2009 and22 December 2009, the State party was requested to submit information concerning the admissibility and merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide that information by 1 January 1994 so that it might be considered by the Committee at its forty-fourth session.
On 14 December 2000, 24 July 2001, 21 October 2003 and7 July 2004, the State party was requested to submit to the Committee information on the merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide the author with an effective remedy, which should include a review of his conviction with the guarantees enshrined in the Covenant, as well as adequate reparation, including compensation.
On 12 November 2002, 26 May 2003 and30 July 2003, the State party was requested to submit to the Committee information on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to supplement its submissions in relation to the above questions and request for information as soon as possible, but in any event within three months of the date of transmittal of the admissibility decision.
By notes verbales of 1 February 2005, 19 May and20 December 2006, the State party was requested to submit information on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
The State party was requested to provide any available data on the number of legal abortions carried out, and to indicate what factors, in addition to the need to preserve the mother's physical health, were recognized as grounds for legal abortion.
Pursuant to rule 108, paragraph 9, of the Committee's rules of procedure,the State party was requested not to expel the petitioner to Iran pending the consideration of his case by the Committee.
The State party was requested to provide statistics in its next periodic report on the ethnic and racial make-up of the population, and details of the role of the Commission for Protection against Discrimination, the Ombudsman and the National Council for Cooperation on Ethnic and Demographic Issues.
On 21 July 2010, 28 June 2011, 2 November 2011, and10 May 2012, the State party was requested to submit its observations on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
Therefore, the State party was requested to submit its observations on the admissibility and the merits of the present case.
Since the Constitution contained no provisions condemning or prohibiting racial discrimination,the State party was requested to consider adding such a provision to its Constitution.
Therefore, the State party was requested to submit further observations as to the admissibility and the merits of the case.
By notes verbales of 26 May 2004, 16 February and 18 November 2005 and28 July 2006, the State party was requested to submit information on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
Therefore, the State party was requested to submit further observations as to the admissibility and the merits of the case.
On 22 November 2010, 21 December 2011, 18 April 2012, 19 June 2012 and6 June 2013, the State party was requested to submit its observations on the admissibility and merits of the communication.
Pursuant to rule 86 of the rules of procedure, the State party was requested to refrain from adopting measures which would cause irreparable harm to the environment which the authors claim is vital to their culture and livelihood.