Примеры использования Purposes of interpretation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This should be sufficient for the purposes of interpretation, and it has not been thought necessary to amend these comments.
The resulting problems might be alleviated by making a distinction between using the other treaty for the purposes of interpretation or application.
Agreed that the relevance of statements of the parties for purposes of interpretation depended on whether they constituted an indication of common agreement by the parties.
The legislature thus emphasized the need to apply, by means of the law, the criteria developed by international human rights law for purposes of interpretation.
It must be borne in mind, however, that preparatory work may exist andmay be made available for purposes of interpretation, even though there is of course no guarantee that it can be made available at any time.
In accordance with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties(United Nations, 1987, article 31(2)),the preamble is part of a treaty for the purposes of interpretation.
What was key for purposes of interpretation and application was the principle that international humanitarian law was not prejudiced by the convention nor did the convention seek to restrain the development of that law.
Members also said that the object and purpose of the unilateral act, which the Rapporteur considered fundamentally treaty-based, should be taken into account for the purposes of interpretation.
There were circumstances in which silence orthe conduct of a State would be inevitably taken into account for the purposes of interpretation of the treaty in the event of a dispute between two contracting States.
The parts of the declarations that do not specifically describe the action that will be taken, that is, the part in which the obligation is assumed, could be considered their preambular parts for the purposes of interpretation.
Exceptions are the cases which invite the Court to refer to additional sources of the international law for the purposes of interpretation of applicable legal norms, as well as when this is necessary to punish perpetrators of the most serious criminal offences.
The following Sections of these Terms and Conditions shall survive any termination of these Agreements by either party: 17, 20, 21, 22, 24, 25, 26, 27 and 29,along with any other Sections which are required for the purposes of interpretation.
In order to refute that argument, it would have to be shown that should the General Assembly act in the manner described,the provision in the resolution whereby the Convention was adopted could, for the purposes of interpretation, be covered under article 31(a) or(b) of the Vienna Convention, especially if that resolution was adopted without a vote.
The following Sections of these Terms and Conditions shall survive any termination of these Agreements by either party: 13, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23 and 24,along with any other Sections which are required for the purposes of interpretation.
While it is true that, in such declarations, there is no specific preambular part,the possibility that some part thereof could be considered preambular for the purposes of interpretation should not be ruled out; similarly, the Note accompanying the 1956 Declaration on the Suez Canal, sent by the representative of Egypt to the Secretary-General of the United Nations on 24 April 1957, could be viewed in this light.
The distinction between subsequent practice under article 31 and that under article 32,as well as the weight to be given to it in each case for the purposes of interpretation, would be clarified in the commentary.
We recall that Article 31(3) of the Vienna Convention provides that together with the context(a) any subsequent agreement,(b) subsequent practice, or(c) any relevant rules of international law applicable between the parties, shall be taken into account for the purposes of interpretation.
As regards the suggestion that the fifth preambular paragraph should be placed in the main body of the convention as an independent article,a view was expressed that, for the purposes of interpretation, a preambular clause had the same legal effect as the operative paragraphs of a treaty.
We consider that the European Communities conflates the preliminary question of what may qualify as a'circumstance' of a treaty's conclusion with the separate question of ascertaining the degree of relevance that may be ascribed to a given circumstance, for purposes of interpretation under Article 32.
There were specific circumstances in which the silence or conduct of a State with a direct and substantial interest in the detail orclarification provided by the interpretative declaration of another contracting State would inevitably be taken into account for the purposes of interpretation of the treaty, for example, in the event of a dispute between two contracting States.
Furthermore, there is the question of the preamble and the annexes, which, despite the difference between the conventional act and the unilateral act,could be considered as belonging to the context for the purposes of interpretation within the scope of unilateral acts.
The key is the circumstances, and even the unique and even exceptional circumstances in which the silence or conduct of a State with a direct and substantial interest in the detail orclarification provided by the interpretative declaration of another contracting State will inevitably be taken into account for the purposes of interpretation of the treaty, for example, in the event of a dispute between two contracting States.
Turning to the draft preamble and revised draft articles on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, he said that, while it had been suggested that the fifth preambular paragraph should be placed in the main body of the convention as an independent article,it should be kept in mind that, for the purposes of interpretation, a preambular clause had the same legal effect as the operative paragraphs of a treaty.
Such a definition would not prevent taking into account, for the purpose of interpretation, a legally non-binding understanding under Article 32.
The taking into account of other treaty practice by States for the purpose of interpretation should not be excluded at the outset since it may in some situations serve as a supplementary means of interpretation in the sense of article 32 of the Vienna Convention.
Yet the two should remain separate, because the purpose of interpretation was to clarify the meaning of the text, whereas application entailed determining the consequences arising for the parties, or for third parties in certain circumstances.
This is ultimately a question of terminological convenience since its response does not imply a conclusion regarding the value of a"subsequent agreement" between a limited number of States parties for the purpose of interpretation of the treaty.
Turning to draft conclusion 5 on the attribution of subsequent practice, she said that paragraph 1 thereof, and the clarifications contained in the commentary, were particularly useful because, as stated therein,it was the subsequent practice attributable to the parties to a treaty that could be taken into account for the purpose of interpretation.
It would be difficult to identify a reason why an agreement by the parties which occurs between the moment when the text of a treaty has been established as definite andthe entry into force of the treaty should not be as relevant for the purpose of interpretation as an agreement which occurs after the entry into force.
International courts and tribunals have distinguished between agreed"subsequent practice" in the sense of article 31(3)(b) of the Vienna Convention, on the one hand, and subsequent practice in a broadersense by one or more parties to the treaty which may also be relevant for the purpose of interpretation.