Примеры использования Revised working paper submitted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Revised working paper submitted by Ireland.
Her delegation welcomed the revised working paper submitted by Cuba A/52/33, para. 59.
The revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/52/33, para. 29) had the merit of having introduced the highly important concept of the“humanitarian limits” of sanctions.
It particularly looked forward to continued discussion of the further revised working paper submitted by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela.
Further revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation.
With respect to the maintenance of international peace andsecurity, India felt that the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/AC.182/L.100/Rev.1) should be taken into account.
In that connection, the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/63/33, annex) was extremely important and merited full consideration and support.
Ms. Tansu-Seçkin(Turkey) urged delegations to conclude work on the basic conditions and standard criteria for the introduction andimplementation of sanctions based on the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation.
The issues covered by the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation were valid and deserved consideration.
Consensus should also be sought among all concerned as to how to improve the working methods of the Committee,bearing in mind the ideas outlined in the revised working paper submitted by Japan and co-sponsored by the Republic of Korea, Thailand, Uganda and Australia.
In that connection, the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation was highly pertinent and merited full attention.
His delegation intended to submit a new paper for substantive debate during the next session, andit looked forward to discussing the paper to be submitted by Ghana and the further revised working paper submitted by the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which would undoubtedly be a focus of substantive debate in future sessions of the Special Committee.
She supported the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/63/33, annex), which should continue to be considered on a priority basis by the Special Committee.
Paragraphs 31 to 36 reflected the Committee's discussion of the further revised working paper submitted by Cuba at its 2009 session, entitled"Strengthening of the role of the Organization and enhancing its effectiveness.
The revised working paper submitted by Japan(A/AC.182/L.108/Rev.1) contained a number of useful elements for consensus-building with regard to the working methods of the Special Committee.
The Special Committee had also considered a revised working paper submitted by Cuba, entitled"Strengthening the role of the Organization and enhancing its effectiveness" A/52/33, paras. 59-74.
The revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/52/33, para. 29) raised well-founded concerns which his delegation shared and which deserved serious consideration.
His delegation had also studied with interest the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation entitled"New issues for consideration in the Special Committee" A/48/33, para. 95.
The revised working paper submitted by the sponsor delegation was relevant to the reform of the Organization and the elements contained therein addressed the legal aspects of the reform and remained valid.
In that connection, her delegation supported the revised working paper submitted by Japan and the other sponsors and suggested that the Committee should consider adopting the measures proposed therein soon.
The revised working paper submitted by Cuba(A/52/33, chap. III) deserved further consideration, particularly as it reflected the concern of many delegations with strengthening the General Assembly.
A working paper consolidating the texts of the revised working paper submitted by Brazil anda number of other developing countries and the revised working paper submitted by France and Germany was produced.
The revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation entitled"Basic conditions and standard criteria for the introduction of sanctions and other coercive measures and their implementation" deserved serious consideration.
Other delegations remarked that the issues were similar to those raised in the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation, entitled"Basic conditions and criteria for the introduction of sanctions and other coercive measures and their implementation" see sect. B above.
The revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation entitled"Basic conditions and standard criteria for the introduction of sanctions and other coercive measures and their implementation" also contained various ideas that merited consideration.
Consideration of the further revised working paper submitted by Cuba at the 2009 session of the Special Committee, entitled"Strengthening of the role of the Organization and enhancing its effectiveness.
He also supported the revised working paper submitted by the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya(A/AC.182/L.99) and the working papers submitted by Cuba(A/AC.182/L.93 and Add.1), all of which related to strengthening the role of the Organization, in particular the Security Council.
Egypt welcomed the revised working paper submitted by Cuba(A/52/33, para. 59), which would complement the work of the Open-ended Working Group on the Question of Equitable Representation on and Increase in the Membership of the Security Council and Other Matters Related to the Security Council.
He further supported the revised working paper submitted by Belarus and the Russian Federation at the 2005 session of the Special Committee(A/60/33, para. 56), which contained a proposal to seek an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on a question relating to the legal consequences of the use of armed force.
The Rio Group agreed with some of the ideas contained in the revised working paper submitted by the Russian Federation(A/AC.182/L.100/Rev.1), in particular the idea that sanctions were an extreme measure which must have clearly defined purposes and a time frame, be applied in strict conformity with the provisions of the Charter and, once implemented, must be subject to regular review.