Примеры использования Some delegations considered на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Some delegations considered such a clause redundant.
However, some delegations considered that the catalogue could be improved.
Some delegations considered it superfluous, not to say problematic.
In this regard, some delegations considered that the rights of victims should be at the core of any regulatory framework.
Some delegations considered the element to be generally acceptable.
In particular, some delegations considered that a right of return could be recognized only for aliens lawfully present in the expelling State.
Some delegations considered that the proposed text should not be modified.
Some delegations considered that a simple reference in the preamble would suffice.
Some delegations considered that priorities should be set within each subprogramme.
Some delegations considered the recommendation out of context and untimely.
Some delegations considered that the role of men should also be highlighted in paragraph 14.14.
Some delegations considered that the principle of strict liability should apply to States.
Some delegations considered that other provisions, such as those of chapter 1.4, should apply.
Some delegations considered that the main challenge in providing assistance was development.
Some delegations considered that there was a need for explanatory texts in other parts of ADR.
Some delegations considered cooperative arrangements at the regional level to be the most effective ones.
Some delegations considered that Chapter 8.4 and special provisions S14 and S21 should be revised.
Some delegations considered that hermetically-closing tanks(SGAN code) would be more appropriate.
Some delegations considered that not all existing mandates had been sufficiently reflected in the programme of work.
Some delegations considered that article 60 could be moved to the chapter on international cooperation.
Some delegations considered that this guidance could be based on the United Nations scale of assessments.
Some delegations considered that the concept of"bottomry" was out of date and should be excluded from the list of maritime claims.
Some delegations considered that these recommendations should be implemented taking into account the various national interests and contexts.
Some delegations considered that poverty eradication is important, but it is not the only prerequisite for sustainable development.
Some delegations considered that insufficient consensus had been reached to start developing a binding international instrument.
Some delegations considered that the list of aggravating and mitigating circumstances set out in paragraph 2 was too restrictive.
Some delegations considered that the list of maritime claims set out in article 1 of the 1952 Convention was incomplete and out of date.
Some delegations considered that there was no need to include such provisions since they concerned the carriage of foodstuffs.
Some delegations considered that the revised articles did not adequately reflect the different views that had been expressed during the debate.
Some delegations considered that more emphasis should have been placed on the follow-up of the World Summit for Social Development.