Примеры использования They are inadmissible на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Accordingly, the Committee considers that,to the extent that the author's communications relates to events occurring after 19 June 1998, they are inadmissible under article 1 of the Protocol.
As regards Mr. P. 's allegations submitted to the Committee on behalf of his son,the State party argues that they are inadmissible, partly because they fall outside the scope of the Convention, partly because they are manifestly ill-founded.
In the absence of any further arguments put forward by the authors on this issue,the Committee considers that these claims are not sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
With regard to the complaints lodged on behalf of the author's son Milan Vojnović,the State party argues that they are inadmissible ratione temporis as the events took place in August 1991 and thus before the State party's ratification of the Optional Protocol.
As for the authors' allegations in relation to article 9,the State party submits that they are incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant or, in the alternative, that they are inadmissible on the ground of non-substantiation.
As a rule, main engines vertical overloads that appear while HSGBs motion at choppy sea, are so high that they are inadmissible either for the crew and its passengers or even for the HSGB hull in the view of its strength.
As the author has not disproved these arguments, the Committee considers that the claims under article 14, paragraph 1,of the Covenant have not been sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee considers that, even assuming that the authors' claims would not be inadmissible due to non-exhaustion of domestic remedies(article 5, paragraph 2(b),of the Optional Protocol), they are inadmissible either because they fall outside the scope of any of the provisions of the Covenant invoked by the authors, or because they have not been sufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility.
The Committee therefore considers that the author has not sufficiently substantiated her claims for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, the Committee considers that the author has failed to substantiate his claims under these articles for purposes of admissibility, and that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
In these circumstances, the Committee is of the view that the author's claims have not been sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
In the light of this ruling, the Committee finds that the author's claims in this respect have not been sufficiently substantiated to establish their admissibility and decides that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee considers that the claims under article 14, paragraph 5, of the Covenant have been insufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and it concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Thus, the Committee considers that the claims under article 14, paragraph 5,of the Covenant have been insufficiently substantiated for purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee considers that the allegations concerning article 14, paragraph 5,of the Covenant have been insufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee thus considers that the claims under article 15, paragraph 1,of the Covenant have not been sufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concludes that they are inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
As for the author's allegations in relation to article 9 of the Covenant,the State party submits that they are incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant pursuant to article 3 of the Optional Protocol or, in the alternative, that they are inadmissible on the ground of non-substantiation under article 2 of the Protocol.
I don't have to because they're inadmissible.
With regard to the complaint of a violation of articles 9 and 18 of the Covenant, the Committee considered that they were not sufficiently substantiated,and concluded that they were inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Thus, the Committee considered that the claims under article 14, paragraph 5,of the Covenant had been insufficiently substantiated for the purposes of admissibility and concluded that they were inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
They are thus inadmissible under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Parts deliveries are inadmissible, inasmuch as they have not been expressly agreed.
Members and representatives of an FTO, if they are alien, are inadmissible to and, in certain circumstances, removable from the United States.
In light of the above, the author's claims under article 7 and 14 are inadmissible on the grounds that they are not sufficiently substantiated.
It is questionable however whether they were intended also to cover reservations which are inadmissible in limine.
It is questionable however whether they were intended also to cover reservations which are inadmissible in limine.
Polygraphs are inadmissible.
Mistakes are inadmissible because can be fatal.
The Court dismissed the claims for damages against the two German companies, however,on the grounds that they were inadmissible under the time-barring provisions of paragraph 477 of the German Civil Code(BGB), in the version which was in force until 31 December 2001.
Such arguments are therefore inadmissible if they are invoked for the first time before the court of cassation.