Примеры использования To submit communications на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The capacity of the States to submit communications.
It is recommended to submit communications in English as this will considerably speed up its consideration.
Substantiation of complaint; abuse of the right to submit communications.
Abuse of the right to submit communications; failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
OHCHR also provided advice to individual lawyers who planned to submit communications.
Claims which constitute an abuse of the right to submit communications or which are incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant Optional Protocol, art. 3.
Procedural issues: Insufficiently substantiated claim,abuse of the right to submit communications.
The notion of abuse of the right to submit communications came up in some cases.
In a letter dated 3 August 2004,the author asserts that he is not abusing the right to submit communications.
It is standard convention practice for Parties to submit communications in any of a COP's official languages.
In the State party's view, therefore, the communication is unfounded andconstitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications.
The State party maintains that the author has abused the right to submit communications, and that the present communication is manifestly unfounded.
However, it was recognized that the predictability of future meetings was an important factor,in particular for those who planned to submit communications.
Article 2 could be interpreted as giving individuals the right to submit communications to the Committee and the rules of procedure should therefore be amended to reflect current practice.
The State party considered that the delay in submitting the communications was significant,constituting an abuse of the right to submit communications.
With reference to element 7,it was stated that, as only victims should have the right to submit communications, it would be only the victim and the State party that could provide information on a case.
The State party also maintains that the alleged violation of article 14, paragraph 5,of the Covenant should be found inadmissible as an abuse of the right to submit communications.
The Optional Protocol entitles individuals andgroups of individuals to submit communications concerning alleged violations of the Convention by a State party to the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women.
The NGO Coalition stressed the importance of granting national and international nongovernmental organizations(NGOs)the standing to submit communications on behalf of alleged victims.
Some delegations were of the view that organizations should be granted the right to submit communications but that the groups or organizations entitled to do so should be limited to, for example, groups or organizations with an interest in women's rights.
Several delegations suggested that the State party should be called upon to cooperate in the effective exercise of the right to submit communications or information to the Committee.
Article 2 of the draft OP andall the alternative formulations establish the right of the claimant(s) to submit communications, stating that“communications may be submitted by…”.
The first OP contains both formulations, with article 1 establishing the Committee's right to receive and consider communications andarticle 2 establishing the right of the claimant(s) to submit communications.
Article 46 should therefore be amended to establish clearly that it did not prejudice the right of individuals to submit communications to the Committee under the Optional Protocol to the Covenant.
The State party claims that the communication is inadmissible as it is incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant andconstitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications.
The Committee considers that, in the circumstances, the allegation by the author constitutes an abuse of the right to submit communications, in accordance with article 3 of the Optional Protocol" annex VII, sect. U, para. 6.2.
Under article 3 of the Optional Protocol,the Committee can declare inadmissible any communication which it considers to be an abuse of the right to submit communications.
It also claims that the communication is inadmissible as constituting an abuse of the right to submit communications, inter alia because of the time that elapsed before its submission and its manifest lack of substance.
While stating a strong preference for not establishing a fund,Sweden proposed compromise language for a fund exclusively geared towards assisting individuals to submit communications.