Примеры использования To verify and value на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The procedures adopted by the Panel to verify and value the first instalment claims.
D8/D9 business loss claims typically constitute the most complex category"D" loss type to verify and value;
However, the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
In order to verify and value the portion of the Claim relating to evacuation costs, senior financial officers from Air India and the Shipping Corporation of India were interviewed.
The procedures adopted by the Panel to verify and value the direct financing losses.
With respect to the claim for repairs to the Al Samah exchange building,the Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
In view of such evidentiary deficiencies, the Panel is unable to verify and value Galileo's claim for losses arising from the interrupted purchase orders.
However, the Panel notes that despite the requests referred to at paragraph above,the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
The Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the claim for other tangible property losses from three of the schools.
The Panel therefore finds that the evidence is not sufficient to verify and value the claim.
However, the Panel finds that the evidence is not sufficient to verify and value the claim, and therefore recommends no award of compensation for staff overtime.
With respect to those loss elements of the Claims that the Panel determined were,in principle, compensable, the Panel proceeded, with the assistance of the expert consultants, to verify and value the loss elements.
However, the evidence was not sufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
With the requirements of article 35 of the Rules in mind, the Panel developed, with the assistance of its expert consultants,evidentiary guidelines that it used to verify and value each Claim.
Nor has sufficient evidence been provided to verify and value the amount claimed.
These claimants were asked, in article 34 notifications, in supplementary written requests for further documentation and information sent prior to the on-site inspection, and at interviews with members of the Commission's verification team inSaudi Arabia during the on-site inspection, to provide evidence to enable the Panel to verify and value the asserted losses.
However, the Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
Because of the nature of these claims, the Panel sought to verify and value these claims, and the claims for regular expenses referred to in paragraph 45 above, as claims for loss of profits or surplus income.
The evidence adduced by the claimant does not permit the Panel to verify and value that amount precisely.
The Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the claim for increased expatriate staff travel costsand therefore recommends no award of compensation.
No schedule of repairs or invoices for the repairs have been provided. The Panel finds that the evidence is not sufficient to verify and value the claim for damage to the Riyadh building.
The Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the claim for overtime costs and therefore recommends no award of compensation.
With the requirements of article 35 of the Rules in mind, the Panel developed, with the assistance of its expert consultants,evidentiary guidelines that it used to verify and value each Claim that was found to be compensable in principle.
The Panel finds that the Claimant has not provided evidence sufficient to verify and value the claims for emergency equipment, subsistence expenses and increased expatriate staff travel costs.
The Panel finds that for the reasons stated at paragraph above, the real property damage to the Claimant's buildings is, in principle, compensable. However,the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed.
However, the Panel finds that the evidence is insufficient to verify and value the full amount claimed for damage to buildings.
Mindful of the direction of the Governing Council in decision 123 that"stand alone" claims are to be processed in subcategory"E4" as Kuwaiti corporate claims,the Panel is of the view that the starting point in considering an appropriate claims review procedure to verify and value"stand alone" claims is that used in earlier"E4" instalments.
The Panel therefore finds that the evidence is not sufficient to verify and value the claim, and recommends no award of compensation for overtime.
The Panel finds that because the Claimant has not provided evidence sufficient to verify and value its claims for increased fuel consumption, staff meal costs, modifications to buildings and emergency rooms, subsistence expenses, telephone connections to civil defence units and increased expatriate staff travel costs, it recommends no award of compensation for these claims.
However, the Panel finds that because the Claimant has not provided evidence sufficient to verify and value the claim, it therefore recommends no award of compensation.