Примеры использования Upgraded enterprise resource planning systems на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Consequently, the Board decided to carry out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards and new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A, and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions in its report(see A/61/350), the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS)as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In this connection, the Advisory Committee recalls that the Board of Auditors had carried out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems see A/63/5 Vol.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee(see A/61/350),the Board of Auditors carried out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of ACABQ in its report(A/61/350),the Board carried out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions in its report A/61/350, the Board decided to carry out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to thecomments of ACABQ in its report(A/61/350), the Board decided to carry out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of ACABQ in its report(A/61/350), the Board undertook a gap analysis relating to the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS)as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A, and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(A/61/350 and Add.1), the Board carried out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS,as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(A/61/350),the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A, and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(see 61/350 and Add.1),the Board carried out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions in its report(A/61/350),the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions in its report A/61/350, the Board decided to carry out a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions in its report A/61/350, the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions in its report contained in document A/61/350,the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of IPSAS and of new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 A and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee(see A/61/350), the Board of Auditors carried out a gap analysis on the state of readiness of entities as reflectedin their IPSAS plans, as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 60/283 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(see A/61/350), the Board reviewed the implementation of the InternationalPublic Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS) and of new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative andBudgetary Questions in its report A/61/350, the Board performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards as well as new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
In accordance with General Assembly resolution 61/233 and in response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions in its report on the financial reports and audited financial statements and reports of the Board of Auditors for the period ended 2005(A/61/350 and Add.1),the Board again performed a gap analysis relating to the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards and new or upgraded enterprise resource planning systems.
UNODC should, however, ensure that its own enterprise resource planning systems are upgraded and coincide with the United Nations timetable for implementation of the latter's new enterprise resource planning system. .
In response to the comments of the Advisory Committee on Administrative and Budgetary Questions(A/61/350), the Board reviewed the progress of UNICEF towards the implementation of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS),as well as the development or upgrading of any related enterprise resource planning systems.
The higher level of harmonization of business processes across the United Nations system resulting fromthe adoption of the International Public Sector Accounting Standards(IPSAS) and the implementation of standard, non-customized, enterprise resource planning systems provided further opportunities for more cost-efficient enterprise resource planning implementation, support and upgrade.
The Advisory Committee was informed,upon enquiry, that the full range of requirements of the enterprise resource planning system were not known at the time of budget formulation, and later, considering that the required equipment and systems upgrades would directly benefit the readiness of field missions in deploying the systems, the redeployment was requested by the Department of Field Support at Headquarters.
Furthermore, over time it has become necessary to propose major information technology infrastructure projects, such as server upgrades and the continuation of the enterprise network implementation to ensure a sufficient and reliable infrastructure to sustain enterprise-wide systems and applications, including the enterprise resource planning system(Umoja), the standardized access control project(PACT) and the global service desk and request management system iNeed.
Estimates of the future costs for operating,maintaining and upgrading the enterprise resource planning system;
The study demonstrates the need for the adoption of a next generation enterprise resource planning system rather than an upgrade of IMIS, referred to as IMIS.
The UNODC requirement for the new enterprise resource planning system arises from the need to implement IPSAS and upgrade IMIS.
The increased requirements were attributable mainly to:(a) acquisitions of equipment andspare parts for the expansion and upgrade of the information technology network infrastructure in Goma to accommodate the additional MONUSCO personnel redeployed to the eastern part of the Democratic Republic of the Congo;(b) higher cost of information technology services owing to implementation of a new enterprise resource planning system which went live on 1 November 2013.
The forthcoming transition to the new enterprise resource planning system had convinced UN-Habitat not to upgrade the current system so as to reduce the number of manual operations involved in preparing the financial statements.
The Committee recalls that in its report addressing the first progress report onthe implementation of Umoja(A/64/7/Add.9, para. 87), it had expressed its view that an estimate of future maintenance and upgrade costs was an essential input for informed decision-making on the proposals of the Secretary-General for the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system and had requested that an estimate of a range of future operating costs be provided to the General Assembly.