Примеры использования Veto right на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Veto right.
We believe that the consensus rule does not give any delegation a veto right.
The veto right should belong to all or to none.
We believe also that Council reform will not be complete as long as the veto right is not eliminated.
The veto right should be restricted, and an obligation to state the reason for its use should be established.
Люди также переводят
A few delegations favoured option 1 with the party's veto right contained in square brackets.
However, I believe it is important to reiterate that consensus does not give any delegation a veto right.
Whether the veto right should be granted to any new permanent member after curtailing its scope of application;
Along that path, Venezuela will continue to stress the need to eliminate the veto right per se.
Whether the veto right should be granted to any new permanent member without curtailing its scope of application;
A high-level working group shall consider the extent to which the veto right is extended to new permanent members;
Cuba indicated that this was an artificial debate as the principle of consensus constituted a de facto veto right.
Another proposal will involve the use of the veto right in ratifying a decision by a two-thirds vote of the General Assembly.
Of course, in this context, we still have the remarkable and anachronistic veto right, be it overt or covert.
However, if the spouses disagree,the father has the veto right so that the father's family name will be transmitted to the children.
The structure of the Security Council should be reformed,especially by abolishing the discriminatory privilege of the veto right.
Adopting decisions by consensus, a veto right over any decision by each member of the coalition, stipulated in its founding documents.
My delegation shares the view of the majority of Member States that the veto right needs to be abolished eventually.
The veto right flies in the face of the principle of equal sovereignty among States as stipulated in the Charter and contravenes the principles of justice and democracy.
However, for the Council to be both effective and legitimate, the veto right should not, under any circumstances, be extended to new permanent members.
A number of delegations used and abused the consensus concept, as was the case inthe Conference on Disarmament, using it as a veto right.
A high-level working group shall consider the extent to which the veto right is extended to new permanent members. See A/52/47, annex XXI, para. 3.
First, the veto right should be limited and then phased out, because it is not in keeping with the principle of equality among States as embodied in the Charter.
In this connection, we emphasize the need to review the veto right, whose use should be confined to the areas covered by Chapter VII of the Charter.
We are convinced that ideas involving the infringement of the prerogatives andauthority of the current permanent members of the Security Council, including the veto right, would be counter-productive.
In our view today,with more than 40 member States, this veto right, which is enshrined in the statutes of ATP, should therefore be abolished as soon as possible.
However, we are prepared to consider the idea of establishing a third category of membership as semi-permanent members,electable for a period of five to six years, without the veto right.
As long as the veto right exists, it has to be extended to the new permanent members so as not to create a new category of membership of the Security Council.
They allege that this new legislation is still discriminatory towards women because it gives the father a veto right by allowing him to oppose the transmission of the mother's family name.
At least the veto right should be restricted just to modifications to the general statutory basis(Articles 1-20), permitting the technical requirements defined in Annexes 1-3 to be adjusted faster to match the state-of-the-art.