Приклади вживання Government interference Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Tired of government interference?
The press should be utterly free of Government interference.
Government Interference in Business.
They don't need government interference.
Government interference in business affairs.
They are strongly against government interference.
Minimal government interference in business.
The market is self-regulating and does not need government interference.
Government interference in the marketplace doesn't work?!
Those jobs are gone, thanks to government interference in the economy.
Government interference should be kept to a minimum.
A free and adequate market can self-regulate, without government interference.
Government interference in economic activities is minimal.
A free market is a market that is free from government interference, prices rising and falling in accordance with supply and demand.
Government interference is eager to protect the farmer against the vicissitudes of the market.
It has been pointed out that it would be an error tolook upon credit expansion exclusively as a mode of government interference with the market.
Minimal government interference in the activities of entities.
The work of the Ministry of Information Policy has shown that government interference in any sphere does not guarantee fast and good results.
Government interference always means either violent action or the threat of such action.
While laissez faire eliminates the causes of international conflict, government interference with business and socialism create conflicts for which no peaceful solution can be found.
Any government interference in private life except for tax collection, it was considered not admissible regarded as an attack on the freedom of individuals.
Critics claim that the focus on ease of business and reduced government interference results in job insecurity, reduced social services, and increased social inequality.
Any government interference in private life except for tax collection, it was considered not admissible regarded as an attack on the freedom of individuals.
Finally, it is the existence of mechanisms that stabilize relations between civil society andthe state which provide with the necessary level of protection against government interference.
It is important to remember that government interference always means either violent action or the threat of such action.
No government interference is needed to prevent the residents of New York from spending all their money in dealings with the other forty-nine states of the Union.
This prevents people from government interference in the private life, the imposition of alien values and standards.
And government interference with the deposits of commercial banks cannot be justified by the hypocritical pretext that poor ignorant wage earners and farmers must be protected against wicked bankers.
But it is important to remember that government interference always means either violent action or the threat of such action.