Примери за използване на Alleged infringer на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The intention of the alleged infringer to achieve that result?
In submitting a claim, you understand and accept that your identity andclaim may be communicated to the alleged infringer.
For example, the proprietor may have to supply a copy of the patent into the language of an alleged infringer, or into the language of the court proceedings when this is different from the language of the patent.
By submitting a claim, you understand, accept and agree that your identity andclaim may be disclosed to the alleged infringer.
Prior to such proceedings, it is thus for the proprietor of the SEP in question, first,to alert the alleged infringer of the infringement complained about by designating that SEP and specifying the way in which it has been infringed.
In submitting a claim, you understand, accept and agree that your identity andclaim can be communicated to the alleged infringer.
In certain instances, it should be possible to permit the alleged infringer, subject to the lodging of one or more guarantees, to continue to use the trade secret, in particular where there is little risk that it will enter the public domain.
In submitting a case, you realize acknowledge as well as consent that your claim andidentity might be communicated to the alleged infringer.
The bringing of an action for a prohibitory injunction against an alleged infringer by the proprietor of a standard-essential patent which holds a dominant position may constitute an abuse of that dominant position in certain circumstances.
The website owner and/or the ISP will forward a copy of the notification of claimed copyright infringement to the alleged infringer.
In the case of a dispute concerning a claim for damages,the court hearing the dispute shall take into consideration that the alleged infringer may have acted without knowing or having reasonable grounds to know that he was infringing the patent before having been provided with the translation referred to in paragraph 1.
Please note that we may share the identity andinformation in any copyright infringement claim we receive with the alleged infringer.
This Article requires that in the case of a legal dispute the patent proprietor provides at the request and the choice of the alleged infringer a full translation of the EU patent into an official language of the Member State in which either the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
Please remember that we might discuss the identity as well as info in any copyright infringement case we get with the alleged infringer.
In infringement proceedings the patent proprietor must provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the specification into an official language of the country in which the alleged infringement took place or the alleged infringer's domicile.
Please note that the identity andinformation in any copyright infringement claim we receive may be communicated to the alleged infringer.
In the case of a dispute relating to an EU patent, the patent proprietor shall provide at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the patent into an official language of the Member State in which either the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
Member States shall ensure that the competent judicial authorities may, at the request of the trade secret holder, order any of the following provisional andprecautionary measures against the alleged infringer.
Further, given that the procedural rules of the Member States have not been approximated by EU law,it is necessary to ensure that an alleged infringer always has the right to obtain a full translation of the EPUE concerned.
Where, pursuant to Article 54 of Regulation(EC)No 6/2002, an alleged infringer seeks to join the proceedings, he/she shall be subject to the relevant provisions of Articles 28, 29 and 30 of this Regulation, and shall in particular file a reasoned statement and pay the fee referred to in Article 52(2) of Regulation(EC) No 6/2002.
According to the Department of Commerce, this includes the ability for law enforcement to seize anddestroy suspected counterfeit products without notifying the alleged infringer, preventing the counterfeit goods from reaching the market.
Second, after the alleged infringer has expressed his willingness to take a license on FRAND terms, the owner must submit to the former a written offer on FRAND terms, in accordance with the duty imposed by the standardization body and specifying, in particular, the amount of the proposed royalty and how it is calculated.
In this Opinion, I propose that Directive 95/46 does not preclude national legislation granting an association tasked with the protection of consumers,such as the Applicant, standing to bring an action against an alleged infringer of data protection laws(A).
Where the alleged infringer continues to use the patent in question, the alleged infringer has not diligently responded to that offer, in accordance with recognised commercial practices in the field and in good faith, this being a matter which must be established on the basis of objective factors and which implies, in particular, that there are no delaying tactics.
Therefore, in the light of the above,my first interim conclusion is that Directive 95/46 does not preclude national legislation which grants public-service associations standing to commence legal proceedings against the alleged infringer of data protection legislation in order to safeguard the interests of consumers.
The competent court should assess the circumstances of the individual case and,inter alia, should take into account whether the alleged infringer is a SME operating only at local level, the language of the proceedings before the EPO and, during the transitional period, the translation submitted together with the request for unitary effect.
In the case of an infringement committed on a commercial scale, the Member States shall ensure that, if the injured party demonstrates circumstances likely to endanger the recovery of damages, the judicial authorities may order the precautionary seizure of the movable andimmovable property of the alleged infringer, including the blocking of his/her bank accounts and other assets.
In the event of a dispute relating to an alleged infringement of a unitary patent, the patent proprietor shall provide, at the request and the choice of an alleged infringer, a full translation of the unitary patent into an official language of either the participating Member State in which the alleged infringement took place or in which the alleged infringer is domiciled.
Accordingly, the proprietor of an SEP which considers that that SEP is the subject of an infringement cannot, without infringing Article 102 TFEU, bring an action for a prohibitory injunction or for the recall of products against the alleged infringer without notice or prior consultation with the alleged infringer, even ifthe SEP has already been used by the alleged infringer.
The competent court should assess the circumstances of the individual case andinter alia should take into account whether the alleged infringer is a small and medium-sized enterprise operating only at local level, the language of the proceedings before the European Patent Office and, during the transitional period, the translation submitted together with the request for unitary effect.