Примери за използване на Surrender procedures на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
On the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Is the Public Prosecutor in Zwickau a judicial authority within the meaning of Article 6(1)of the Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States?
Even if the duration of surrender procedures varies greatly between EU countries, it has significantly decreased on average.
Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member.
Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- European arrest warrant- Surrender procedures between Member States- Decisions rendered at the end of proceedings in which the person concerned has not appeared in person- Execution of a sentence pronounced in absentia- Possibility of review of the judgment.
The European Union has adopted a Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA- European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States- Article 4(6)- Ground for optional nonexecution of a European arrest warrant- Interpretation of the terms‘resident' and‘staying' in the executing Member State).
On 13 June 2002, the Council of the European Union agreed a framework decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states.
Article 6(1) of the Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, should be interpreted as meaning that the term‘issuing judicial authority' does not include the institution of the Public Prosecutor's Office.
European Union- Police andjudicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
(Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA- Articles 31 and32- European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States- Possibility for the State executing an extradition request to apply a convention adopted before 1 January 2004 but applicable in that State from a later date).
The Commission adopted on 11 July 2007 the second report on the implementation of the Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States.
Case C-66/08: Proceedings concerning the execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Szymon Kozłowski(Police andjudicial cooperation in criminal matters- Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA- European arrest warrant and surrender procedures between Member States- Article 4(6)- Ground for optional nonexecution of a European arrest warrant- Interpretation of the terms‘resident' and‘staying' in the executing Member State)(Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart).
This reference for a preliminary ruling concerns the interpretation of Article 4(6)of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ 2002 L 190, p.
The most important Framework Decision is that on the European Arrest Warrant and Surrender Procedures between the Member States of the European Union(EAW).
In this context,the Council would like to draw Parliament's attention to the fact that it is in the process of finalising the fourth round of mutual evaluations on the practical implementation of the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States.
Seven years after the entry into force(on 1 January 2004)of the Council framework decision of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant(EAW) and the surrender procedures between Member States, the Commission has published some statistical data collected in the Member States between 2005 and 2009.
This Framework Decision should also, mutatis mutandis, apply to the enforcement of sentences in the cases under Articles 4(6) and 5(3)of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(3).
Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States OJ 2002 L 190, p.
Proposal of 25 September 2001 for a Council Framework Decision on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between the Member States(COM(2001) 522 final).
Article 4(6) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, is to be interpreted to the effect that.
In case of breach of the supervision measures,have to refuse to surrender the person concerned in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(6)(hereinafter referred to as the‘Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant').
In case the person concerned does not return to the issuing State voluntarily, he orshe may be surrendered to the issuing State in accordance with Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States(2)(hereinafter referred to as the‘Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant').
In the present case, LM, the respondent in the main proceedings, is the subject of three arrest warrants issued by Polish courts on the basis of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States,(4) as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009(5)(‘the Framework Decision').
The surrender procedure based on a European Arrest Warrant is settled at first instance in one of the 28 district courts.
KOZŁOWSKI examined on its own initiative, given the very tight deadlines applicable to the surrender procedure in that situation.
If the existence of that risk cannotbe discounted within a reasonable period, that authority must decide whether the surrender procedure should be brought to an end.
If the existence of this risk cannot be ruled out in a‘reasonable time',the executing authority must decide whether it should terminate the surrender procedure.
The definition of serious crime should be taken from Article 2 of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European Arrest Warrant and the surrender procedure between Member States38.
Where applicable, regard must be had to‘the effects of the surrender procedure and the transfer of the person concerned residing in a Member State other than… on that person's social and family relationships'.