Esimerkkejä P-values käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
A P-values by logrank test.
Such question might center on whether they computed their p-values correctly.
A p-values based on Chi-squared test.
May simply be greater transparency.Another solution to p-hacking and the overemphasis on p-values.
All p-values are pairwise comparisons of proportions for Humira versus placebo.
Follow-up analysis was performed with a data cut-off date of 07 March 2014; all p-values are displayed for descriptive purpose only.
P-values were< 0.001 for both mTSS and erosion score and≤ 0.01 for JSN score.
Median values from Kaplan-Meier analysis; HR and p-values from Cox regression models adjusting for important prognostic factors.
P-values for comparison versus pre-Tx values were computed using paired t-tests.
Pre-Tx Pre-treatment; SD Standard Deviation; SDS Standard Deviation Score[1] P-values for comparison versus pre-Tx values were computed using paired t-tests.
Tho 100 All p-values are pairwise comparisons of proportions for Trudexa versus placebo* p< 0.001.
Primary endpoint a OR for response rates based on Mantel-Haenszel estimate of the common odds ratio for stratified tables; p-values by Cochran Mantel-Haenszel test.
All p-values are pairwise comparisons of proportions for Humira versus placebo* p< 0.001** p< 0.01.
Remission is defined as DAS<1.6 Pairwise comparison p-values:† p< 0.05 for comparisons of Enbrel+ methotrexate vs methotrexate and p< 0.05 for comparisons of Enbrel+ methotrexate vs Enbrel.
Wald p-values are quoted for the comparison of treatments using logistic regression with factors for treatment and region.
Other studies: p-values compared each efalizumab group with placebo using Fisher's exact test within each study.
All p-values adjusted for multiplicity of testing based on pre-defined hierarchy, except BASDAI 50 and ASDAS-CRP.
P-values were derived from comparison for change from baseline within analysis of covariance model with treatment as term and baseline as covariate.
The p-values for ORR and Global Health Status/Quality of Life(QoL) scores are descriptive based on the pre-specified multiplicity adjustment plan.
Pairwise comparison p-values:† p< 0.05 for comparisons of etanercept+ methotrexate vs. methotrexate and Φ p< 0.05 for comparisons of etanercept+ methotrexate vs. etanercept.
All p-values are adjusted for multiplicity of testing based on pre-defined hierarchy, except for ACR70, Dactylitis and Enthesitis, which were exploratory endpoints.
All p-values< 0.001 for all comparisons between Xiapex and placebo, except for PIP joints in Study CORD II which was not eligible for statistical testing due to a hierarchical testing procedure.
P-values compared efalizumab with placebo using logistic regression including baseline PASI score, prior treatment for psoriasis and geographical region as covariates. b p< 0.001.* As judged from the patients' histories of psoriasis treatments.
P-values for URAI refer to the null hypothesis that efficacy differed between subgroup strata(URAI, no URAI). b Relative risk reduction calculated for mITT based on incident seroconversion, ie, occurring post-baseline through first post-treatment visit approximately 1 month after last study drug dispensation.
P-values< 0.05 comparing pemetrexed/ cisplatin to gemcitabine/ cisplatin, using Fisher Exact test.**Refer to National Cancer Institute CTC(v2.0; NCI 1998) for each Grade of Toxicity.***According to National Cancer Institute CTC(v2.0; NCI 1998), taste disturbance and alopecia should only be reported as Grade 1 or 2.
P-value vs Observation.
P-value for change from pre-Tx[1] Height Velocity SDS.
P-value for change from pre-Tx[1] Height SDS.
P-value< 0.0001 Objective Response Rate.
R076477-SCH-304 Mean baseline(SD) Mean change(SD) P-value(vs, Placebo) Diff. of IS Means SE.