Esimerkkejä This simplification käytöstä Englanti ja niiden käännökset Suomi
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
The Commission agrees fully with this simplification.
This simplification exercise was of a purely technical nature.
The Commission approves of this simplification.
This simplification will make tax avoidance more difficult.
I hope that the beneficiaries will gain from this simplification, those whom the funds are actually targeted at.
This simplification will be pursued in consultation with Member States.
We can clearly go ahead with this simplification, discussed so much and so many times here.
This simplification will however lead to less administrative requirements.
Secondly- and the rapporteur has also highlighted this- this simplification will also mean significant savings for companies.
But this simplification does not apply to either the United States or Great Britain.
The link between the economic activity of the waste generator and the waste recovery method is lost through this simplification.
Let us hope that this simplification, and the creation of a harmonised common market.
This simplification, however, also entails a number of limitations, indeed dangers, and we therefore need to be vigilant.
To ensure that beneficiaries are not disadvantaged by this simplification, the Impact Assessment explored the option to increase the co-financing rates.
This simplification contains several flaws, which have become increasingly unsustainable for some participants to support.
We all want to simplify this system butunlike the rapporteur's initial proposals, this simplification must not only entail the application of customs tariffs but, conversely, the systematic application of the green tariff.
This simplification is good news for a market that is worth close to EUR 50 billion in trade between the two regions.
Proposed changes to the Framework Directive streamline the market analysis procedure but this simplification needs to be complemented by the establishment of a specialised and independent expert body assisting the Commission in assessing the technological complexities of future markets.
This simplification is required in order to avoid the drawing-up of annual regulations to update legislation, as has occurred in the past.
The EESC supports this simplification measure for very small holdings, for which the cost of controls can be disproportionate.
This simplification measure is also meant to free resources, in terms of time and energies, that can be more productively used for the action.
The transparency resulting from this simplification should provide more efficiency in the implementation, in terms of transposition and compliance with the objectives.
This simplification will mean that a substantial part of the reporting obligations under Commission Decision 95/337/EEC will become obsolete.
An important part of this simplification means moving decisions which at present fall within the customs code, that is the constitution itself, to a committee procedure.
This simplification with this new threshold could have a positive impact on the application of this rule to global grants mechanisms.
Without this simplification the amended rules would impose disproportionate administrative burdens on business and run strongly counter to the Lisbon Strategy.
This simplification is essential for the equity of the system and for the transparency of management, two imperatives which will go towards ensuring the future of Europe.
This simplification must go hand-in-hand with simplification of its implementation, and the Member States must minimise the bureaucratic formalities required of beneficiaries, especially in the area of rural development.
However, this simplification should not lead to a reduction in regional aid to Sweden(also in view of the fact that Sweden is one of the largest net contributors to the EU's budget), particularly to the Objective 6 area.
This simplification should not apply in case of a new prospective member from a third country or overseas territory in order to enable all participating Member States to check whether such accession is in line with its public interest or public policy.