Exemplos de uso de Margin squeeze em Inglês e suas traduções para o Português
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Official/political
Margin Squeeze- shift the compete/ collaboration ratio.
The resulting settlement was based on the margin squeeze methodology as established in the Deutsche Telekom decision50.
In recitals 106 to 139 to the contested decision,the Commission sets out the method which it used to calculate the margin squeeze.
It has a margin squeeze between rising costs and falling prices of zinc.
The applicant submits that the Commission made a mistake in calculating the margin squeeze in Table 11 of the contested decision.
As regards the margin squeeze, recitals 102 to 105 to the contested decision state.
Complaint that the discontinuance charge for wholesale access was included in the margin squeeze calculation.
By contrast, the analysis of the margin squeeze concerns the entry to the market of the applicant's competitors.
It reaches that conclusion in the contested decision(recitals 179 and 180)on the basis of the very existence of the margin squeeze.
Thus, the Commission reached the following conclusions concerning the margin squeeze calculation in Table 12 of the contested decision.
In calculating the margin squeeze, the Commission should therefore also have taken into account the additional revenue generated by such products.
In the period from the beginning of 1998 to theend of 2001,[the applicant] was in a position to end the margin squeeze entirely by adjusting its retail charges.
However, it could have reduced the margin squeeze by increasing its charges for ADSL lines recitals 171 to 175 and 206 to the contested decision.
In that respect, the Commission states in the contested decision that the applicant‘was ina position[during that period] to end the margin squeeze entirely by adjusting its retail charges' recital 199.
It is the Commission's view that DT could have avoided the margin squeeze since 1998, either by reducing the wholesale access fees, or by increasing the retail subscription fees, or by combining the two.
Second, a limited increase in ADSL charges would have led to a higher average retail price for narrowband and associated broadband access services, andwould thus have reduced the margin squeeze identified.
The Commission explains that the applicant‘could have avoided the margin squeeze by increasing retail charges for analogue and ISDN connections' recital 164.
It follows that charges for retail line-rental and for calls andhigher-value services should be compared with the charges relating to that combined offer of services when analysing the margin squeeze.
Iv Absence of an abuse because the applicant had insufficient scope to reduce the margin squeeze by increasing its ADSL retail access charges from 1 January 2002.
The Commission has received several complaints against DT by new entrants on the German telecommunications market, such as Mannesmann Arcor and a large number of local and regional carriers,alleging such a margin squeeze for access to the local network.
The Commission cannot consider that discretion in isolation, since the margin squeeze was not calculated on the basis of the T-DSL(ADSL) charges alone, but on the basis of all the retail prices.
If the Commission had taken account of the charges for line sharing- which are significantly lower than the charges for wholesale access- in assessing the margin squeeze, the result would have been more favourable for the applicant.
In order to be able to find a margin squeeze and in view of the narrow definition of the market used in the contested decision, the Commission should have taken account of additional revenue from the applicant's competitors for connection and higher-value services see, to that effect.
Thus it is clear that‘[t]he abuse committed by[the applicant]consists in the imposition of unfair prices in the form of a margin squeeze to the detriment of its competitors' recital 201 to the contested decision.
The Commission sent a statement of objections to the Spanish incumbent operator preliminarily finding that Telefónica had been abusing its dominant position on the broadband access markets in Spain by way of a margin squeeze infringing Article 82 EC.
Furthermore, as a result of theadministrative practice of RegTP, which has considered the margin squeeze issue on many occasions, the applicant could assume that the Commission would ultimately reach the same conclusion as RegTP.
In the present case, according to the contested decision(recital 201),‘[t]he abuse committed by[the applicant]consists in the imposition of unfair prices in the form of a margin squeeze to the detriment of[the applicant's] competitors.
In the second place,the applicant claims that the method used by the Commission to identify a margin squeeze is defective, because it relies on the proposition that it should be possible for the applicant's competitors to replicate its customer pattern entirely recitals 120 to 127 to the contested decision.
The Commission observes in the contested decision that,‘[s]ince thebeginning of 2002,[the applicant] could in any event have reduced the margin squeeze, by increasing the ADSL retail access charges' recital 199.
In these meetings, particular types of abuse were discussed- predation,refusal to deal and margin squeeze, rebates, tying, excessive pricing and discrimination- with the help of some cases presented by the NCAs.