Examples of using Draft implementing act in English and their translations into Croatian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The draft implementing acts shall be submitted to the Committee referred to in Article 27(1) by 2 January 2016.
The current rules do not incentivise Member States to vote in favour or against the draft implementing act.
Where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Without prejudice to Article 7, if the committee delivers a negative opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act.
Where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
This means that in such cases, the Commission is confronted at the end of the examination procedure with a no opinion scenario,it has discretion whether or not to adopt the draft implementing act.
A consultation procedure for the Council to consult the EP when a draft implementing act is referred to the Council following a dispute between the Commission and a committee of experts;
Days at the earliest and 1 month at the latest after the committee meeting,the Commission shall inform the committee members of the results of those consultations and submit a draft implementing act to the appeal committee.
Where the committee delivers no opinion, the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
The Commission has made a statement recalling that recourse to this provision must not be made systematically butrespond to a specific need to depart from the rule of principle which is that the Commission may adopt a draft implementing act when no opinion is delivered.
Where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
By way of derogation from paragraph 4, the following procedure shall apply for the adoption of draft definitive anti-dumping or countervailing measures,where no opinion is delivered by the committee and a simple majority of its component members opposes the draft implementing act.
If there is no qualified majority for or against(no opinion) the Commission may adopt the draft implementing act- which means that it may also decide not to adopt it.
The Commission shall decide on the draft implementing act to be adopted, taking the utmost account of the conclusions drawn from the discussions within the committee and of the opinion delivered.
Committee members should be given early andeffective opportunities to examine the draft implementing acts and express their views.
Most of the Commission's draft implementing acts in the agricultural sphere are subject to examination procedures as part of which the European Parliament and the Council have a‘right of scrutiny.
In the case of acts referred to in Article 8, where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Any committee member who does not oppose the draft implementing act orwho does not explicitly abstain from voting thereon before the expiry of that time limit shall be regarded as having tacitly agreed to the draft implementing act.
(41) The Commission should not adopt implementing acts relating to the information to be made accessible by vehicle manufacturers for roadworthiness testing where the committee established pursuant to this Directive delivers no opinion on the draft implementing act presented by the Commission.
Where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third paragraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Considering the cooperation which is needed between the Member States and the Commission to develop, maintain and employ the electronic systems required for the implementation of the Union Customs Code(the Code), the Commission should not adopt the work programme supporting that development andgoverning the setting up of transitional periods where no opinion is delivered by the committee examining the draft implementing act.
Where the Committees deliver no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
In such a case, the Commission shall review the draft implementing act, taking account of the positions expressed, and shall inform the European Parliament and the Council whether it intends to maintain, amend or withdraw the draft implementing act.
Where a basic act is adopted under the ordinary legislative procedure, the European Parliament orthe Council may at any time indicate to the Commission that, in its view, a draft implementing act goes beyond the implementing powers provided for in the basic act. .
By way of derogation from Article 5(3) and the second subparagraph of Article 5(4),the Commission may adopt a draft implementing act where it needs to be adopted without delay in order to avoid creating a significant disruption of the markets in the area of agriculture or a risk for the financial interests of the Union within the meaning of Article 325 TFEU.
Where the committee delivers no opinion,the Commission shall not adopt the draft implementing act and the third subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Regulation(EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
The procedure should also ensure that the Commission is able to review the draft implementing acts where no opinion is delivered by the committee, taking into account the views expressed within the committee.
The motion for a resolution may incorporate a request to the Commission to withdraw the draft implementing act or measure, to amend it in keeping with the objections raised by Parliament, or to submit a new legislative proposal.
Either the European Parliament orthe Council should be able at any time to indicate to the Commission that, in its view, a draft implementing act exceeds the implementing powers provided for in the basic act, taking into account their rights relating to the review of the legality of Union acts. .
Where an implementing act is deemed to be necessary,the chair may either submit an amended version of the draft implementing act to the same committee within 2 months of delivery of the negative opinion, or submit the draft implementing act within 1 month of such delivery to the appeal committee for further deliberation.