Examples of using Next programming in English and their translations into Czech
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
This must change in the next programming period.
We have to make efforts to prevent a reduction in the funding made available for cohesion policy in the next programming period.
Therefore, funds intended for cohesion policy in the next programming period should not be subject to any reduction.
I voted in favour of the motion for a resolution to support SME finance during the next programming period.
In the next programming period, there is a need for investment in urban as well as sub-urban projects and for better coordination with rural development programmes.
The display now shows the number of the next programming slot.
In the next programming period, then, it may be worth reverting to multifund programmes, incorporating in them the experience gained from joint programming and encouraging shared and responsible management between the various stakeholders in charge of regional development.
There is a lot at stake in the budget negotiations for the next programming period.
I think that an intermediary category is needed for regions for the duration of the next programming period, with the only proviso being that the allocation of funds earmarked for these regions does not affect the allocations intended for achieving the convergence and competitiveness objectives.
Practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period debate.
We certainly believe that these funds are helpful andwe believe they need secure funding for the next financial period or the next programming period, because unfortunately, even if prosperity is coming, we will have to anticipate significant redundancies in certain cases due to restructuring and cross-border relocations.
Therefore, I welcome today's initiative regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period.
By adopting this report, I welcome the fact that Amendment 74 was preserved,since it advocates the creation of a category of regions referred to as'intermediate' for the next programming period 2007-2013 of the cohesion policy and is therefore along the lines of fairer distribution of structural and cohesion funds between regions.
My support for this report recognises the excellent work carried out by Mr Mikolášik andhopes that cohesion policy, even in the next programming period, continues on its path of aggregation and development of territories and the European economy.
The next item is the Commission statement on practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period.
It is very important to establish effective instruments to support SME finance,paying particular attention to mezzanine financial instruments in the next programming period, which would remove obstacles to financing and would promote the creation and growth of new innovative enterprises, providing greater access to European venture capital and bond markets, while at the same time removing the barriers to the development of these markets.
I voted in favour of this important motion for a resolution on practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support SME finance in the next programming period.
A more comprehensive system offering gradual help for transition regions which exceed the threshold of 75% of gross domestic product must be established in the next programming period, so that these regions have a clear status and can develop in greater security.
On the basis of the data gathered andof the analysis of the results obtained, the Committee on Regional Development underlines, in Mr Luhan's report, the close relationship between competition and cohesion, and proposes corrective actions for the next programming period.
We should deepen our reflection on the way the cohesion funds are currently implemented and coordinated on the one hand and,on the other hand, on the way they could be articulated for the next programming period after 2013 in order to keep a real coherent strategic development at regional level.
I am convinced that, in order to achieve this objective, programmes for SMEs must be reorganised in a single common programme for growth and competitiveness, taking into account the experience that has been obtained to date,particularly with a view to providing for the kind of flexibility needed to respond to changes in the markets and in our economies over the next programming period.
This motion for a resolution on the practical aspects of the revision of EU instruments to support finance for small andmedium-sized enterprises(SMEs) in the next programming period is essential in the current situation.
I particularly welcome the call for at least 70% of budget funding to be spent on territorial cooperation in cross-border collaboration, on the one hand, andfor the funding for territorial cooperation to be increased from a level of 2.5% in the current programming period to at least 7% of total budget funding in the next programming period.
By way of conclusion, I would like to emphasise that, in order to achieve genuine social, economic and territorial cohesion and ensure that every European citizen has a goodplace to live and work, the size of the cohesion policy funds in the next programming period must be at least the same as in the current period.
(PT) This European Parliament motion for a resolution deals with practical aspects regarding the revision of EU instruments to support finance for small andmedium-sized enterprises(SMEs) in the next programming period.
This year will be crucial for the Fund's future, because the Commission intends to make a proposal on the rules governing the fund andthe way it will function in the next programming period.
Such an assessment, together with an inventory of the most frequent problems facedby the managing authorities, should contribute to finding more appropriate solutions for the next programming period.
Considering that the territorial cooperation has proved its effectiveness in promoting the harmonious development of the Union as a whole,it's now fundamental to increase its budget from the actual 2.5% to at least the 7% of the overall cohesion policy resources for the next programming period.
Or are we supposed to wait for the next financial programming period?