Examples of using Relevant differences in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Gender: no relevant differences in pharmacokinetics have been observed.
In healthy female and male subjects following single and multiple-doses of tadalafil, no clinically relevant differences in exposure were observed.
No relevant differences in the safety profile were seen in this patient population.
When aclidinium and formoterol were administered in combination by the inhaled route, the pharmacokinetics of each component showed no relevant differences from those observed when the medicinal products were administered separately.
There are no clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of brivaracetam by gender.
People also translate
No relevant differences in exposure were apparent when data from the Caucasian population was compared with either the Japanese or Black population.
There were no clinically relevant differences in safety between males(N=382) and females(N=139) in the FLAGS study.
No clinically relevant differences in the pharmacokinetics of rilpivirine have been observed between men and women.
Although they could lead to substantial benefits by effectively removing all the relevant differences between national laws and by ensuring the same tax treatment across the EU, these options would be technically challenging and politically unacceptable to Member States, not least due to the political sensitivity of tax issues.
No clinically relevant differences in elvitegravir, cobicistat, tenofovir alafenamide, or tenofovir pharmacokinetics were observed between healthy subjects and patients with severe renal impairment(estimated CrCl> 15 but< 30 mL/min) in studies of cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir or of tenofovir alafenamide, respectively.
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of ALIMTA within the histology subgroups.
No clinically relevant differences in adverse reactions were observed between the overall dataset and the approved indications.
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of pemetrexed within the histology subgroups.
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of pemetrexed within the histology subgroups.
In clinical studies, no relevant differences in exposure, safety or efficacy were observed between male and female patients.
In clinical studies, no relevant differences in exposure or efficacy were observed between patients of different ethnic groups.
There were no clinically relevant differences observed for the safety profile of pemetrexed plus cisplatin within the histology subgroups.
No clinically relevant differences in elvitegravir or cobicistat pharmacokinetics were observed between patients with moderate impairment and healthy subjects.
In clinical studies, no relevant differences in exposure, safety or efficacy were observed between elderly(aged 65 years and above) and younger patients see also section 5.2.
In clinical studies, no relevant differences in exposure, safety or efficacy were observed between patients with mild hepatic impairment(Child-Pugh A) and normal hepatic function.
No clinically relevant differences in tenofovir alafenamide, or tenofovir pharmacokinetics were observed between healthy subjects and patients with severe renal impairment estimated CrCl> 15 but.
There were no relevant differences in the distribution of demographics, disease characteristics, or the use of post-study systemic therapy between the subset of patients with detectable EGFR protein expression and the ITT population.
There were no clinically relevant differences in incidence or severity of hypoglycaemia with exenatide compared to placebo, in combination with a thiazolidinedione, with or without metformin.
There were no clinically relevant differences between naloxegol 12.5 mg, 25 mg, and placebo in average pain intensity, daily opioid dose or in opioid withdrawal scores over the 12-week study.
In the phase III clinical study, no relevant differences in safety or efficacy were observed between patients with mild renal impairment(creatinine clearance[CLCR]: 50 to 80 mL/min) and normal renal function.
There were no other clinically relevant differences between two concurrent injections of Xiapex in the same hand and up to three single injections of Xiapex in the types of adverse events reported ie, most adverse events were local to the treated extremity and of mild or moderate intensity.
Race: no relevant difference between Caucasian, Asian and Black subjects has been observed.
There was no relevant difference in local tolerability or in the nature and frequency of adverse reactions.
So far we assumed that the only relevant difference between Superfund and this proposal was on retrospectiveness.
Modigraf should not be switched with Advagraf as a clinically relevant difference in bioavailability between the two formulations cannot be excluded.