Examples of using This would avoid in English and their translations into Finnish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
This would avoid distortion of the owners, misunderstandings and lies evening.
For short-term hiring, this would avoid the need for the rental company to verify whether the customer is a private individual or a taxable person.
This would avoid the process of EU rulemaking for marketing standards.
This would avoid"abuse" and the risk of manipulation when using nudges.
This would avoid the decline in employment income and future situations of poverty.
This would avoid the current paragraph 62 repeating the call contained in paragraph 66.
This would avoid the above described shortcoming of the coexistence of national schemes.
This would avoid farmers ploughing up their land just to prevent it from becoming permanent grassland.
This would avoid many of the difficulties encountered with other trade agreements because we were not consulted.
This would avoid the need to fund as many acts of mastering as countries covered or VoD platforms concerned.
This would avoid a negative impact on the interests of the shareholders while achieving some savings for the companies involved.
This would avoid over- prescription and leave airlines free to exercise their commercial judgement in other areas.
This would avoid the reactive behaviour that has characterised EU action over recent years when faced with various crises.
This would avoid the risk of positive conflicts of jurisdiction, where several Member States conduct their own trials.
This would avoid duplication, boost complementarities and speed up the delivery of assistance with overall efficiency gains.
This would avoid all Member States having to supply their consulates with the equipment necessary to collect biometric data.
This would avoid the high economic costs and even mistakes associated with failing to take the gender perspective into account in research.
This would avoid unnecessary and potentially harmful competition between Member States in the recruitment of certain categories of workers.
This would avoid duplication of effort and place the emphasis on a political approach rather than an official one, which is generally more effective.
This would avoid duplication of work while ensuring long-term consistency in the promotion of the EU's strategic interests and fundamental values abroad.
This would avoid further widening the gap between these areas and the more dynamic ones in which research activities have traditionally been concentrated.
This would avoid the element of discretion which normally accompanies the transposition of annexes and give Article 16 its due importance among the directive's objectives.
This would avoid the element of discretion which normally accompanies the transposition of annexes and give Article 16 its due importance among the directive's objectives.
This would avoid the application of the"provisional twelfths" scheme which would have major consequences to the implementation of key policies and programmes.
This would avoid there being too many fishermen in one place, for the fish would also like to be left to live their lives in peace and become pensioners as well.
This would avoid the perverse effects linked to the charging of the Union's administrative expenditure and expenditure on Community policies to the country where these sums are actually spent.
This would avoid the endless and systematic piling up of seven day cabotage periods that currently seems possible, and make it clearer where a duty to create an establishment in the host country appears.
This would avoid the risk of transmitting advertisements for products banned from being advertised on television or unlawful advertisements, which can currently be screened provided that there is no conclusive demonstration of payment and, therefore, of their nature as a television advertisement.
This would avoid a proliferation of individual legal bases- in line with the overall MFF approach towards streamlining and simplification- whilst still exploiting both the common general objectives and the potential for economies of scale and harmonisation of administrative and management procedures.
This would avoid the misunderstandings- some genuine and some, I am afraid, wilfully encouraged- that can grow in the minds of some that this is a sort of extreme cantonist round in which we are trying to extract ounces of flesh from our negotiating partners who are not in a position to pay into this round.