Examples of using Raphael programme in English and their translations into Greek
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Source of funding: Raphael programme.
The Raphael programme is an excellent answer.
Cultural heritage- the Raphael programme.
The Raphael programme concerns the European cultural heritage.
From the very beginning there were conflicts over the financial framework for the Raphael programme.
The aim of the Raphael programme was to enhance European cooperation in the area of cultural heritage.
Mr President, like the rapporteur,I certainly welcome the conclusion of the interminable discussions on the Raphael Programme.
So it is now time for the Commission to give some substance to the Raphael programme- and Parliament has, to my mind, offered a wealth of suggestions.
The Raphael programme of Community action in the field of cultural heritage was adopted by the European Parliament and the Council on 13 October(Table I).
The Union must therefore find ways of helping with the restoration work, for instance through the Raphael programme or the structural funds earmarked for Italy.
Mr President, the Raphael programme now under discussion is being put forward in a week of intensive parliamentary work affecting all the sectors covered by this programme. .
Mr President, I believe that nearly everything has been said on the remarkable interest of the Raphael programme at the time of its first reading in October 1995, its second reading in October 1996 and here today.
Amongst other things, the Raphael programme is aimed at supporting projects which are of interest to the Community as a whole, which help to improve the way in which the cultural heritage is represented, and which have a European dimension.
The growing importance which Europeans attach to safeguarding their cultural heritage is reflected in the 495 projects submitted to the Commission with a view to obtaining financial support in the context of the Raphael programme.
With regard to culture,following its participation in the Raphael programme, Latvia has shown its ability to implement the Community's cultural acquis.
Regrettably, the Raphael programme is therefore in danger of remaining a purely marginal and ineffective instrument in a field which is so essential not only to our cultural, but also to our economic and social development.
So many projects can be tackled and when we now publicize this by the fact that we have set up a Raphael programme, then we shall find that we shall receive many applications and we shall probably very quickly have to say"no' for budgetary reasons.
Based on what I have just said, I think that the Plenary should vote in favour of the joint text approved by the Conciliation Committee, butwe must analyse the problems which arose during the approval procedure for the Raphael programme, which took more than two years.
This Decision establishes the Community action programme in the field of cultural heritage, the Raphael programme, set out at Arrnex, hereinafter referred to as'the programme', for the period from 1 January 1997 to 31 December 2000.
Both the Raphael programme- and, Commissioner, we should like an exact financial statement as regards the pilot phase- and today's report have the virtue of acknowledging the importance of this social impact of heritage projects.
Expenditure on essential programmes in the field of Community cultural action has been curtailed in recent years,as was the case with the Raphael programme, for instance. The European Commission's own expectations of this programme as stated in its 1995 proposal have therefore fallen well short of being realised.
The Raphael programme is in fact aimed at establishing a specific action in relation to cultural assets, at creating conditions favourable to the growth and development of synergy between culture and tourism, with new job opportunities- especially for young people- as a likely consequence.
The Union also supports measures for the development of the audiovisual industry(MEDIA), the production, conversion and broadcasting of high-definition television programmes andmeasures to protect the cultural heritage(Raphael programme), support artistic and cultural activities(Kaleidoscope 2000) and promote books and reading(Ariane programme). .
Mr President, Commissioner, ladies andgentlemen, before I assess the Raphael Programme and the Sanz Fernández report, I should point out that a future Europe must be built not only on economic foundations but also on socio-cultural and ecological bases.
Therefore, the Raphael Programme will preserve and publicise what we have in common, this rich and diverse cultural heritage in all of the Member States and regions, and will bring out the European dimension of the cultural heritage, respecting the cultural diversity of our people.
HAVING REGARD TO the Committee of the Regions Opinions on the KALEIDOSCOPE 2000 programme(artistic and cultural activities) CdR 145/95 the ARIANE programme(books andreading)(CdR 146/95) the Raphael programme(cultural heritage)(CdR 302/95) and on the"First report on the consideration of cultural aspects in European Community action"(CdR 206/96 fin);
Furthermore, the cultural activities and the Raphael Programme will enhance mutual knowledge between the European peoples, bring out the values which are common to us and favour tolerance and mutual respect in times when exclusion seems to be growing and the rejection of anything different is on the increase.
In the documents which we are now analysing we should point out that the Raphael Programme is aimed at supporting and complementing Member States' actions in the fields of cultural heritage of European importance, something which is both enormous and very rich, and which everyone knows about.
The Raphael Programme, Mr President, is fundamental for protecting and promoting the cultural heritage and, in other words, it is fundamental for protecting the European cultural identity, the very cornerstone of European citizenship, the very raison d'être for our presence here.
Now that we are discussing the Raphael programme at second reading, I should like to highlight a number of points, following on from the concerns expressed by Mr Sanz Fernández, rapporteur for the Committee on Culture, Youth, Education and the Media, whom I would congratulate once again on his excellent work.