Examples of using Draft legislative act in English and their translations into Hungarian
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Programming
-
Official/political
-
Computer
Parliament may approve, amend or reject the draft legislative act.
The institution which produced the draft legislative act may decide to maintain, amend or withdraw it.
If that proposal for rejection is adopted,the President shall ask the originating institution to withdraw the draft legislative act.
Parliaments have 8weeks to issue a'reasoned opinion' if they consider that a draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Any draft legislative act should contain a detailed statement making it possible to appraise compliance with the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality.
Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission, After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments.
A draft legislative act must be reviewed when reasoned opinions cast by National Parliaments represent at least one third(18 votes) of all the votes allocated to them(54 votes).
The Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality allows national Parliaments toissue reasoned opinions if they consider that an EU draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
There will be areinforced control mechanism of subsidiarity in the sense that if a draft legislative act is contested by a simple majority of the votes allocated to national parliaments, the Commission will re-examine the draft act, .
Having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of theprinciples of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
If Parliament rejects the committee's decision to enter into negotiations, the draft legislative act and the report of the committee responsible shall be placed on the agenda of the following part-session, and the President shall set a deadline for amendments.
Having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Where a member of the Council declares that a draft legislative act referred to in the first subparagraph would affect important aspects of its social security system, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system, it may request that the matter be referred to the European Council.
Having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarityand proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Where a member of the Council declares that a draft legislative act referred to in the first subparagraph would affect important aspects of its social security system, including its scope, cost or financial structure, or would affect the financial balance of that system, it may request that the matter be referred to the European Council.
Having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the French Senate,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
If the originating institution does not withdraw the draft legislative act, the President shall announce that the first reading of Parliament is concluded, unless, on a proposal of the Chair or rapporteur of the committee responsible or of a political group or at least 40 Members, Parliament decides to refer the matter back to the committee responsible for reconsideration.
Having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Austrian Federal Council and the Swedish Parliament,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Save where a proposal for rejection has been adopted in accordance with paragraph 1 or a provisional agreement has been adopted in accordance with paragraph 1a,any amendments to the draft legislative act shall then be put to the vote, including, where applicable, individual parts of the provisional agreement where requests have been made for split or separate votes, or competing amendments have been tabled.
Having regard to the reasoned opinion submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament,as well as the contribution by the Romanian Senate asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
The text of the legislative resolution and of Parliament's position shall be forwarded, by the President, to the Council and the Commission, as wellas, where the draft legislative act originates from them, to the originating group of Member States, the Court of Justice or the European Central Bank.
(2),- having regard to the written and reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Swedish Parliament,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
The text of the legislative resolution and of Parliament's position shall be forwarded, by the President, to the Council and the Commission, as well as,where the draft legislative act originates from them, to the originating group of Member States, the Court of Justice or the European Central Bank.
Having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Danish Parliament, the United Kingdom House of Commons and the United Kingdom House of Lords,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Article 7 The European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, and, where appropriate, the group of Member States, the Court of Justice,the European Central Bank or the European Investment Bank, if the draft legislative act originates from them, shall take account of the reasoned opinions issued by national Parliaments or by a chamber of a national Parliament.
Having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Lithuanian Parliament, the Romanian Senate and the Swedish Parliament,asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.
Having regard to the reasoned opinions submitted, within the framework of Protocol No 2 on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality, by the Netherlands Senate, theNetherlands House of Representatives and the Swedish Parliament, asserting that the draft legislative act does not comply with the principle of subsidiarity.