Examples of using Development would in English and their translations into Romanian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
We believe that such a development would be extremely unfortunate.
Development would be impossible without steel, which is used in every area of our life.
If these barriers were removed, development would become natural.
Any other development would necessitate a different text and different provisions.
At this moment it is largely a matter of speculation to what extent such development would affect facilities and labour opportunities in Europe.
Such a development would be ominous for Canadian workers' pay and conditions.
When the first“test tube baby” was born in London in 1978,even the doctors couldn't have known how this development would open a new era in treating infertility.
Another potential area of development would be tightening the links between EQAVET and ECVET.
Prodi noted that while resolving the Cyprus issue is not a pre-condition to launching EU accession negotiations with Turkey, such a development would bolster relations.
Such a development would impede later harmonisation of technical standards within the Union.
During their meeting,Ruete said that Bulgaria had become more attractive for foreign investors and that the pace of development would help the country soon meet criteria for EU entry.
Such a development would put our prosperity, economic progress and social status under serious pressure.
During a visit to the Kosovo PoliceService School in Vushtri, Jessen-Petersen said such a development would likely increase both the competences and the responsibilities of local police.
Such a development would bring social, cultural and economic benefits to the overall development of the EU.
The increased funding for small and medium-sized enterprises, which represent the majority of Europe's enterprise, andthe extra funding for research and development would help to further alleviate the effects of this crisis.
Politicians believe such a development would be dangerous for Serbia's negotiating position on Kosovo.
This means that as the procedures are revised, we will oppose the idea of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund(EGF) becoming just another instrument, for example, an instrument of the cohesion policy,because that would mean that all the EU's money apart from funds put aside for foreign policy or research and development would belong to the cohesion policy.
Such a development would mean other balances between the economic and political subjects in the country and beyond it.
Moreover, explicitly including Africa's social economy in the 2010 European Report on Development would allow for the drafting of a specific social protection policy in EU development cooperation, which is currently absent.
Such a development would lead to a significant advance as far as the presence of the international community in Bosnia Herzegovina is concerned.
From an economic point of view,any such development would exacerbate the recession by cutting domestic demand and internal consumption.
Such a development would violate the constitution, which describes Kosovo as an inalienable part of the state and prohibits any change to this status.
This development would very much fit into the concept of Motorways of the Sea, which is also included in the EU White Paper on European transport policy.
Such a development would engender even more controversy, as voters would be asked to give the thumbs up or down to the whole package, and not to individual changes.
Such a development would result naturally in the division step-by-step of the tasks, responsibilities and legal obligations in various areas between Chisinau and Tiraspol, but this time with the endorsement of the"5+ 2" format.
On the basis of these assumptions and given that development would only start as from 2015, it is proposed to set aside 1.1 billion EUR for these two systems under this proposal, without prejudice to the future proposals from the Commission on the smart borders package and the subsequent decision of the European Parliament and the Council.
These developments would also reduce mortality, with benefits estimated up to€ 17 billion per year in 2030, and up to€ 38 billion in 2050.
These developments would also reduce mortality, with benefits estimated at around€ 7 to 17 billion per year in 2030, and€ 17 and 38 billion in 2050.
Such developments would result in increased environmental pressures and the deterioration of valuable habitats with serious economic and social consequences including an irreversible deterioration of the European agricultural production capacity.
Such developments would seem to be very much in harmony with the EU's Lisbon Strategy-- an ambitious plan to make Europe the world's most competitive economy by 2010.