Examples of using Does not in itself constitute in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The existence simply of a local agent orlow level staff does not in itself constitute physical presence.
A section titled"Allegations concerning War Crimes" elucidates this use of Military necessity, distinction and proportionality: Under international humanitarian law and the Rome Statute, the death of civiliansduring an armed conflict, no matter how grave and regrettable, does not in itself constitute a war crime.
The segregation of a prisoner from the prison community does not in itself constitute a form of inhuman treatment.
The presence of racism is an aggravating factor when accompanying the commission of an actionable crime but does not in itself constitute a crime.
The customary nature of a norm set forth in a treaty provision does not in itself constitute an obstacle to the formulation of a reservation to that provision.
It should also be emphasized that although the concept covers numerous existing international law obligations,it remains a political concept and does not in itself constitute a new norm.
Being a citizen of the Party whose compliance is at issue does not in itself constitute a conflict of interest ECE/MP. PP/C.1/2010/6, para. 6 e.
The Committee reiterates that the Optional Protocol does not establish any deadline for the submission of communications, and that the period of time elapsing before doing so,other than in exceptional cases, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
For the State party, the fact that the complainant was a lawyer anda member of DUP does not in itself constitute sufficient grounds for assuming that if he were returned to the Sudan, he would be in danger of being subjected to treatment contrary to article 3 of the Convention.
However, the reservation in question cannot be separated from the statement and does not in itself constitute a unilateral statement.
As for military withdrawal from part of the occupied territory, it does not in itself constitute the end of the occupation if the occupying Power maintains security control by other means, particularly by encirclement or by military control of the air space.
The fact that a federal State permits differences among the federal units in respect of jury trial does not in itself constitute a violation of article 26 of the Covenant.
The existence of a pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights in a country does not in itself constitute sufficient reason for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon returning to that country; additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individual concerned would be personally at risk.
It follows that the existence in that country of a pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights does not in itself constitute sufficient grounds for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture if deported to that country. Additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individuals concerned would be personally at risk.
The fact that a State party that is a federal union permits differences among the federal units in respect of jury trial does not in itself constitute a violation of article 26.
The existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights in a country does not in itself constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon his or her return to the country.
The Committee recalled that the Optional Protocol establishes no time limit for the submission of communications and that the passage of time,other than in exceptional cases, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
It follows that the existence in that country of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights does not in itself constitute sufficient grounds for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture if expelled to that country. Additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individual concerned would be personally at risk.
The Committee considers that the fact that a federal State permits differences among the federal units in respect of jury trial does not in itself constitute a violation of article 26 of the Covenant.
The existence in a country of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights does not in itself constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture on his or her return, therefore additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individual concerned would be personally at risk.
It stated that adequate medical care was available in Azerbaijan and that financial problems in obtaining medical care or a lower standard of medical care provided in Azerbaijan than in Sweden does not in itself constitute grounds for a residence permit.
The State party points out that a consistent pattern of flagrant ormassive violations of human rights in a country does not in itself constitute a sufficient ground for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon his or her return to that country.
The Committee reiterates that the Optional Protocol does not establish any deadline for the submission of communications, and that the period of time elapsing before doing so,other than in exceptional cases, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
It follows that the existence in that country of a pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights does not in itself constitute sufficient grounds for determining that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture if deported to that country. Additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individuals concerned would be personally at risk.
The Committee observes that the Optional Protocol does not establish time limits within which a communication should be submitted, and that the period of time elapsing before doing so,other than in exceptional circumstances, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right of submission of a communication.
The Committee reiterates that the existence of a pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights in a country does not in itself constitute sufficient reason for concluding that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon returning to that country; additional grounds must be adduced to show that the individual concerned would be personally at risk.
The Committee reiterates that the Optional Protocol does not establish any deadline for the submission of communications, and that the period of timeelapsing before doing so, other than in exceptional cases, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right to submit a communication.
Consequently, the existence of a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant ormass violations of human rights in a particular country does not in itself constitute a sufficient ground for concluding that a particular person would be in danger of being subjected to torture after returning to his country; additional grounds must exist in order to conclude that the person concerned is personally at risk.
The Committee observes that the Optional Protocol does not establish time limits within which a communication should be submitted, and that the period of time elapsing before doing so,other than in exceptional circumstances, does not in itself constitute an abuse of the right of submission of a communication.