Examples of using Draft code should in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Work on the draft Code should be concluded with the utmost speed.
He therefore questioned whether the draft Code should cover such acts.
However, the draft Code should include the crime of illicit trafficking in narcotic drugs.
It would only caution that any surgery performed on the draft Code should not be excessive.
The draft Code should be adopted as a treaty, as it had elements in common with other international conventions.
Thus, his delegation was currently of the view that the draft Code should take the form of an international convention.
The draft Code should be dealt with in 1997 in the context of the definition of the crimes to be included in the court's jurisdiction.
With regard to the applicable law,she considered that the draft Code should constitute the basis for such law.
In that connection, the draft Code should address only crimes committed by an individual through participation in an aggression committed by a State.
Given their relevance to the contemporary needs of the international community,two of the six crimes excluded from the draft Code should be retained.
His delegation believed that the draft Code should be adopted, possibly with a few minor adjustments, as a declaration by the General Assembly.
Welcoming the fact that the Commission had discussed the inclusion of penalties in the draft Code, he said that the draft Code should contain a general provision on the nature of possible penalties.
Lastly, all the comments regarding the draft Code should be brought to the attention of the Preparatory Committee, to facilitate the progress of its work.
His delegation also shared the view that consistency should be maintained between the draft statute and the draft Code, and that in order toavoid duplication of work the Preparatory Committee should give consideration to the proposal that the draft Code should be incorporated in the draft statute.
In addition, the draft Code should take the form of an international convention, so that it would result in a legally binding instrument for the States that ratified it.
Regarding specific crimes,his delegation believed that the definition of aggression in the draft Code should be a legal one, even if it was based on the definition of aggression contained in General Assembly resolution 3314 XXIX.
The draft Code should form part of the statute of a future international criminal court, but whatever form it took it was essential to ensure, at all costs, that it did not go unheeded.
The Commission had asked the General Assembly whether the draft Code should be adopted as a convention, incorporated into the draft statute of the court or adopted as a declaration.
The draft Code should not take the form of a convention or declaration of the General Assembly before the completion of the work on the establishment of an international criminal court, in order to avoid duplication of efforts.
In order to achieve the greatest possible consistency between the two texts, the draft Code should be one of the fundamental documents considered in the discussions on the Statute for an International Criminal Court.
While the draft Code should, on the whole, constitute a codification of existing law, it was doubtful whether every provision of the draft Code needed to be based on existing law.
Mr. MÜLLER(Germany) strongly endorsed the view that the list of crimes to be included in the draft Code should contain only those offences whose characterization as crimes against the peace and security of mankind was generally accepted.
As to the form the draft Code should take, his delegation believed that it should be incorporated in the statute of an international criminal court, provided that doing so would not unduly delay completion of the work.
Since most of the crimes listed in the draft Code had been included in treaties orbecome part of customary law, the draft Code should take the form of an international convention, in order to avoid weakening the authority of existing instruments.
His delegation believed that the draft Code should be adopted in the form of an international convention that was separate from all other international instruments, including the draft statute of the international criminal court.
As to the action that should now be taken on the draft Code, his delegation believed that the Commission's failure to make any specific recommendations in that connection was motivated by its fundamental conviction,illustrated in article 48 of its report(A/51/10), that the draft Code should become a legal instrument which enjoyed wide acceptance among States.
Article 1 of the draft Code should be reviewed and should include a general definition of the crimes included in the Code, and as well as a clear statement of the characteristics of such crimes, with a view to providing objective criteria.
Rather than being the subject of a separate exercise aimed at the drafting of an international convention andconducted in parallel with efforts to establish the international criminal court, the draft Code should be forwarded to the Preparatory Committee with a recommendation that it should be used, along with other proposals before the Committee, as the basis for drafting the statute of the court.
The crimes to be included in the draft Code should fulfil two criteria: they should actually constitute crimes against the peace and security of mankind, and they should be suitable for regulation by that type of instrument.
The draft Code should also include as crimes certain acts of terrorism which constituted a threat to the peace and security of mankind, thereby providing a useful benchmark for the work of the Preparatory Committee on the Establishment of an International Criminal Court.