Examples of using Dynamic efficiency in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Dynamic efficiency.
Between allocative and dynamic efficiency. 4- 7 3.
Dynamic Efficiency comprises these three TNC functions.
More information about dynamic efficiency can be found here https.
Dynamic Efficiency comprises three functions.
This application example clearly illustrates the benefits of Dynamic Efficiency.
Dynamic Efficiency from HEIDENHAIN addresses exactly these points.
It can particularly be increased with Dynamic Efficiency from HEIDENHAIN.
The Dynamic Efficiency software package includes the following features.
Intellectual property rights andthe trade-off between allocative and dynamic efficiency.
Dynamic Efficiency helps to to increase the metal removal rate and reduce machining time.
There are also sometimes trade-offs tosome extent between competition, static efficiency, and dynamic efficiency.
Dynamic efficiency is probably the most important beneficial effect of competition.
Looks forward to the report by the Executive Secretary on dynamic efficiency gains achieved by the end of 2012;
In this way, Dynamic Efficiency achieves dramatic time savings in this machining example.
The COP 17 requested the Executive Secretary to report on dynamic efficiency gains achieved by the end of 2012.
The functions of Dynamic Efficiency optimize removal rates and thus increase productivity in heavy duty cutting.
The relationship between competition andinnovation(and thus dynamic efficiency) is not obvious to economic theory.
A mandated report on dynamic efficiency gains achieved by the end of 2012 is contained in document FCCC/SBI/2013/INF.5.
In this machining example, compared with conventional machining methods, Dynamic Efficiency increases productivity by 40.
However, it is reasonable to expect that there are cheaper cleaner production technology options whose introduction would be stimulated by an SO2 charge this would characterise the charge's dynamic efficiency.
Its need and aspiration to increase static and dynamic efficiency in production, thus upgrading technological capability, would be restrained.
In addition, foreign direct investment fosters competition and technological externalities and spillovers,which also contribute to dynamic efficiency.
The effects of IPRs in terms of market dominance,static and dynamic efficiency, consumer welfare, trade, foreign direct investment and technological innovation and transfer;
However, the possible trade-offs it may involve with competition are greater than in the case of static efficiency, andevaluation of them is also more difficult because dynamic efficiency is hard to measure or predict.
Incentives to reduce pollution andto introduce technical innovation(the so-called“dynamic efficiency”) may be worth introducing, as well as flexibility in the ways and means to comply with environmental requirements.
There is a shortage of data as to the effects of RBP control and competition advocacy efforts, and there have sometimes been tensions andtrade-offs among competition and static and dynamic efficiency.
Dynamic Efficiency Economic instruments should be evaluated in a dynamic context because they can create some incentives for technological innovations and introduction of cleaner technologies, for enterprises to achieve abatement at a lower cost.
Chapter I briefly describes the theory andprovides empirical evidence for the benefits of competition in terms of static and dynamic efficiency and consumer welfare and some trade-offs which may arise.
That organization should also undertake more studies on the relationship between competition law and intellectual property, particularly with reference to the international exhaustion of rights, compulsory licensing andthe balance between static efficiency and dynamic efficiency.