Examples of using Nuclear disarmament commitments in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Nuclear disarmament commitments.
Accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments.
A statement was made by the representative of Mexico who introduced the draft resolution entitled"Towards a Nuclear-Weapon-Free World:Accelerating the Implementation of Nuclear Disarmament Commitments.
Accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments operative paragraphs 5, 6.
Resolution 59/75(Sweden, New Agenda Coalition(NAC)):Accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments;
People also translate
On the contrary, it calls into question the credibility of nuclear disarmament commitments already made and even undermines the principle of undiminished security.
The nuclear-weapon States provided information on their efforts to implement their nuclear disarmament commitments. .
There is a pressing need to see prompt action by nuclear-weapon States to implement their nuclear disarmament commitments, made under article VI of the Treaty, including the total elimination of their nuclear arsenals.
South Africa urges delegations to avail the necessary political will that would advance the implementation of previous agreedupon nuclear disarmament commitments and undertakings.
Crucially, we must accelerate efforts to deliver on global nuclear disarmament commitments, for as long as even a single nuclear weapon exists, humankind is in danger of suffering a nuclear catastrophe by design or by accident.
Resolution 59/75 on accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments; .
Taking stock of existing unilateral,bilateral and multilateral nuclear disarmament commitments and proposals, and aspects, perspectives and challenges that pertain to nuclear disarmament and multilateral nuclear disarmament negotiations.
Resolution 59/75: Accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments. .
It seems that some nuclear-weapon States do not take their nuclear disarmament commitments seriously, but rather are violating their international commitments in the area of nuclear proliferation and totally ignoring the commitments that they made to non-nuclear States.
Attempts to secure advances on non-proliferation while retreating from nuclear disarmament commitments is counterproductive.
Iraq calls on nuclear-weapon States to fulfil their nuclear disarmament commitments and promote mutual commitments in accordance with the principles and components of the non-proliferation regime, especially the commitments of nuclear-weapon States under article VI of the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons.
Given the overall global security environment, the need to accelerate the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments is becoming ever more pressing.
As I sensed at the most recent NPT Review Conference,nuclear-weapon States have been sending mixed signals in recent years about their nuclear disarmament commitments.
My delegation has already placed on record its views on the imperative need to implement nuclear disarmament commitments through the statement of the New Agenda Coalition delivered by the representative of South Africa during the general debate.
Canada voted in favour of General Assembly resolutions 66/40 on measures towardsa nuclear-weapon-free world and accelerating the implementation of nuclear disarmament commitments, and 66/45.
One could conclude that NPT nuclear weapons States have only agreed to these nuclear disarmament commitments in Review Conferences because, in their interpretation, they do not qualify as legally binding commitments. .
Furthermore, many NNWS have long voiced concerns that the five NPT nuclear-weapon States(NWS)are not making sufficient progress in fulfilling their nuclear disarmament commitments under the NPT.
The widening of proliferation was not unconnected with the fact that nuclear-weapon States had still not entirely fulfilled their nuclear disarmament commitments under article VI of the Treaty; there was a need to strengthen the 1995 Principles and Objectives and the 13 steps adopted in 2003.
Consequently, the continued reliance on nuclear weapons in military doctrines and the maintenance, modernization of and long-term investments in nuclear weapons and the nuclear weapons infrastructure are,in their argumentation, compatible with their nuclear disarmament commitments and obligations.
We now look forward tocontinued political will and to more expeditious steps to fulfil the nuclear disarmament commitments enshrined in article VI of the Non-Proliferation Treaty.
Recommendation for the Open-ended Working Group: In Austria's view, the Open-ended Working Group should address these conceptual differences about the quality and status of obligations and commitments on nuclear disarmament in an open andfrank manner and explore ways on how the apparent gap in perceptions on the status of non-proliferation obligations and nuclear disarmament commitments could be reduced.
We now look forward to continued political will andto more expeditious steps to fulfil the nuclear disarmament commitments enshrined in article VI of the Treaty.
Considering the fact that the NPT Review Conferences provide good opportunities to hold the nuclear-weapon States accountable with respect to fulfilling their nuclear disarmament commitments, the present draft resolution urges States parties to follow up on the implementation of nuclear disarmament obligations under the Treaty agreed to at the 1995 and 2000 NPT Review Conferences within the framework of the 2010 Review Conference and its Preparatory Committee.
With the success of the 2010 Review Conference of the Parties to the NPT,this year's draft resolution, like last year's, reflects the New Agenda Coalition's specific focus on ensuring that the nuclear disarmament commitments contained in the Conference's action plan are implemented in full.
To urge the nuclear-weapon States to fully comply with their nuclear disarmament obligations under the Treaty andcompletely implement their unequivocal nuclear disarmament commitments, including the 13 practical steps, that were agreed and reaffirmed by consensus at the 2000 and 2010 Review Conferences of the Treaty, in order to accomplish the total elimination of their nuclear weapons.