Examples of using Supported draft article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Several members supported draft article 9.
He supported draft article 2 as proposed by the Special Rapporteur.
Various members supported draft article 14.
It supported draft article 8 concerning the exercise of diplomatic protection vis-à-vis stateless persons and refugees.
In general, her delegation supported draft article 4.
Some members supported draft article J1 referring to diplomatic protection.
With regard to the draft articles on the protection of persons in the event of disasters, his delegation supported draft article 10(Duty of the affected State to seek assistance) in principle.
Several members supported draft article G1 on protecting the property of aliens facing expulsion.
As a State in whose territory one of the world's largest aquifer systems was situated,Argentina fully supported draft article 3, as proposed by the Working Group on Shared Natural Resources.
Some members supported draft article D1 on the return to the receiving State of the alien being expelled.
The Special Rapporteur confirmed that he no longer supported draft article 6 since it was not strictly necessary in light of draft article 3.
Others supported draft article 12 precisely because it drew such distinctions, so as to avoid the interpretation that nongovernmental organizations are endowed with international legal personality.
With regard to the topic"Responsibility of international organizations",his delegation supported draft article 8, which would require the organs, members and staff of an international organization to act in conformity with their mandates.
His delegation supported draft article 11 Prohibition of disguised expulsion; it would appear that disguised expulsion encompassed situations in which the State tolerated certain acts carried out by citizens with the aim of provoking the departure of an alien from its territory.
While some members supported draft article 8, several other members felt that its scope was too limited.
Several members supported draft article A concerning the prohibition of disguised expulsion, although some considered that the situations covered by that provision should be described in different terms.
Mr. D'Allaire(Canada) said that his delegation supported draft article 16 bis to the extent that REIOs enjoyed undisputed competence in respect of matters covered by the draft convention.
Some speakers supported draft article B, on the conditions of detention of a person who had been or was being expelled.
His delegation supported draft article 28 on international responsibility in case of provision of competence to an international organization.
His delegation supported draft article 29 bis proposed by the Special Rapporteur and believed that chapter V of the draft articles would be incomplete without it.
Some members supported draft article 10, which was said to constitute a major contribution to the progressive development of international law.
While some members supported draft article E1 on the State of destination of expelled aliens, others thought that it should be reconsidered in the light of State practice.
Several delegations supported draft article III-E, pointing out that it was similar to article 7 of the 1992 Declaration and article 2, paragraph 2, of the Convention against Torture.
While some delegations supported draft article I1 on the responsibility of States in cases of unlawful expulsions, the view was expressed that this provision should be formulated more precisely.
Her delegation supported draft article 2 on the purpose of the draft articles and agreed with the view of the Special Rapporteur that the concept of responsibility to protect did not apply to disaster response.
While some members supported draft article A1, several others thought that, in the context of expulsion, certain procedural guarantees must likewise be given to aliens unlawfully in the territory of the expelling State.
The Russian Federation supported draft article B, which rightly established the principle that detention pending expulsion was not punitive and should be carried out differently from detention of accused or sentenced persons.
His delegation strongly supported draft article 3, which clearly set out the general principle of legal stability and continuity while also affirming that treaty rights and obligations could not be ignored merely because of the existence of an armed conflict.
Some States clearly supported draft article 24, one State finding that it was an improvement over the previous version, and another suggesting that consideration should be given to the possibility of applying the provision to persons or groups acting in a private capacity.
His organization fully supported draft article 15; its language was similar to that of the IDRL Guidelines, which had been thoroughly negotiated with disaster management officials from countries around the world and with humanitarian partners.