Examples of using Joint exploitation in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
Paid-for research and development of contract products or contract technologies excluding joint exploitation of the results;
An R&D agreement which includes the joint exploitation of possible future results is not necessarily restrictive of competition.
The setting of production targets where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint production of the contract products.
Proprietors A and B maintain intense commercial and economic relations,although there is no strict dependency between them regarding the joint exploitation of trade mark X;
This principle does not change significantly if the joint exploitation of the results, even joint marketing, is involved.
Proprietors A and B maintain intense commercial and economic relations, although, strictly speaking,there is no dependency between them regarding the joint exploitation of trade mark X;
Joint exploitation of the results of paid-for research and development of contract products or contract technologies pursuant to a prior agreement between the same parties, or.
Paid-for research and development of contract products or contract technologies and joint exploitation of the results of that research and development.
Joint exploitation of the results of research and development of contract products or contract technologies jointly carried out pursuant to a prior agreement between the same parties.
Secondly, there were undeniable legal and economic links between Coca-Cola andSchweppes in their joint exploitation of'Schweppes' as a universal mark.
If, in such a scenario, the R& D cooperation includes joint exploitation only by means of licensing, restrictive effects such as foreclosure problems are unlikely.
In addition, Red Paralela consider that there are undeniable legal and economic links between Coca-Cola andSchweppes International in their joint exploitation of the sign‘Schweppes' as a universal trade mark.
R& D cooperation which does not include the joint exploitation of possible results by means of licensing, production and/or marketing rarely falls under Article 81(1).
This might include exchanging information on national programmes, research activities and health care systems; identifying areas which would benefit from coordination, joint calls or the pooling of resources; facilitatingtransdisciplinary and cross-sectoral mobility and training; and exploring the joint exploitation of research infrastructures and the networking of research centres.
If, in such a scenario, the R&D co-operation includes joint exploitation only by means of licensing to third parties, restrictive effects such as foreclosure problems are unlikely.
The exemption provided for in paragraph 1 shall apply to research and development agreements containing provisions which relate to the assignment or licensing of intellectual property rights to one or more of the parties or to an entity the parties establish to carry out the joint research and development,paid-for research and development or joint exploitation, provided that those provisions do not constitute the primary object of such agreements, but are directly related to and necessary for their implementation.
R&D co-operation which does not include the joint exploitation of possible results by means of licensing, production and/or marketing rarely gives rise to restrictive effects on competition within the meaning of Article 101(1).
The fixing of prices when selling the contract product or licensing the contract technologies to third parties, with the exception of the fixing of prices charged to immediate customers or the fixing of licencefees charged to immediate licensees where the joint exploitation of the results includes the joint distribution of the contract products or the joint licensing of the contract technologies within the meaning of point(m)(i) or(ii) of Article 1(1);
Any joint exploitation may only pertain to results which are protected by intellectual property rights or constitute know-how and which are indispensable for the manufacture of the contract products or the application of the contract technologies.
The exemption should continue to apply, irrespective of the parties' market shares,for a certain period after the commencement of joint exploitation, so as to await stabilisation of their market shares, particularly after the introduction of an entirely new product, and to guarantee a minimum period of return on the investments involved.
Many R&D agreements- with or without joint exploitation of possible results- bring about efficiency gains by combining complementary skills and assets, thus resulting in improved or new products and technologies being developed and marketed more rapidly than would otherwise be the case.
Proprietors A and B maintain intense commercial and economic relations,although there is no strict dependency between them regarding the joint exploitation of the trade mark X, and in addition they maintain a coordinated trade mark strategy deliberately promoting vis-à-vis the relevant public an appearance or image of a single and global trade mark?'.
Most R& D agreements- with or without joint exploitation of possible results- bring about economic benefits by means of cost savings and cross fertilisation of ideas and experience, thus resulting in improved or new products and technologies being developed more rapidly than would otherwise be the case.
If for example in addition to joint research and development, the agreement provides for joint exploitation, Article 81 may apply to this part of the agreement if due to subsequent market developments the agreement becomes restrictive of competition and does not(any longer) satisfy the conditions of Article 81(3) taking due account of ex ante sunk investments, cf.
If, for example, in addition to joint R& D, the agreement provides for joint exploitation, Article 101 may apply to that part of the agreement if, due to subsequent market developments, the agreement gives rise to restrictive effects on competition and does not(any longer) satisfy the conditions of Article 101(3) taking due account of ex ante sunk investments.