Examples of using Proposal in question in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
I believe this is where the great strength of the proposal in question lies.
The proposal in question is intended to replace two regulations2 implementing Article 73 of the Treaty.
Otherwise, the Commission, where appropriate, continues its work on the proposal in question.
(SK) I support the proposal in question aimed at ensuring correct and clear labelling of foodstuffs, including aromatic additives.
It is thereforegrateful to the Council for the optional referral to the EESC of the proposal in question.
The proposal in question serves the interests of both parties, as the rapporteur explains very well, and I therefore voted in favour of the proposal. .
To ensure that these persons are reintegrated into the labour market,I vote in favour of the proposal in question.
Moreover, Regulation(EC) No 736/96, which the proposal in question repeals, is no longer applied consistently and is incompatible with the recent developments in the energy sector.
I would assume that the vast majority of Members of this esteemed Chamberhave not had the opportunity to read the proposal in question.
The Committee thinks that the proposal in question, which is modelled on the impact of the regulation for passenger cars, underestimates the differences between cars and LCV, such as.
(CS) Madam President, Commissioner,first of all I would like to thank the rapporteurs for their work on the proposal in question.
The proposal in question is, however, aimed at extending the application of reduced VAT rates to a variety of services, including labour-intensive services, restaurants, locally-supplied services, construction and transfer of housing, and services provided for the disadvantaged.
Issues raised may be debated in the JURI Committee and can lead to possiblerecommendations to the committee responsible for the subject matter of the proposal in question.
The proposal in question- which I support- is intended to create a harmonious legal framework to guarantee a solid, integrated system for product safety and to instil real consumer confidence in goods on the European market, thereby triggering widespread growth in consumption.
Consider the possibility of extending its Europe 2020 Project Bond initiative to includeinvestment projects for helping to achieve the targets of the proposal in question;
I voted in favour of the report by Mr Maštálka because the proposal in question has been carefully weighed up by the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, which jointly deemed it to be a codification, which is to say, it is merely a streamlined version of the existing text.
As the rapporteur mentions, the proposal in question aims to enable Union manufacturers to sell tractors, to overcome the time of economic crisis currently being experienced, to find new resources for research and to respect European legislation's limits as regards environmental protection, whilst simultaneously replacing the most obsolete tractors with new tractors that have less polluting engines.
In order that citizens of the EU may benefit fully from their internal market, especially in relation to e-commerce,I am voting in favour of the proposal in question.
I voted in favour of this report because, according to the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament,the Council and the Commission, the proposal in question contains a straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance and therefore, in the interests of clarity and rationality, the existing texts should be codified.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on indications ormarks identifying the lot to which a foodstuff belongs concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on braking devices of wheeled agricultural orforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws of the MemberStates relating to units of measurement concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the installation, location, operation and identification of the controls of wheeled agricultural orforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on rear-mounted roll-over protection structures of narrow-track wheeled agricultural andforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
Based on the opinion of the Consultative Working Party of the legal services of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission, this proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on roll-over protection structures mounted in front of the driver's seat on narrow-track wheeled agricultural andforestry tractors concludes that the proposal in question is restricted to the straightforward codification of the existing texts without any change in their substance.
According to the Council,the sensitive nature of that document stems from the fact that the proposals in question concerned the provision to be made in the new regulation on access to documents regarding exceptions from the principle of transparency.
The General Court erred in finding, in paragraph 72 of the judgment under appeal,that such an argument was unfounded because one of the proposals in question, made after the unauthorised disclosure, restricted the right of public access, whereas, contrary to the statements made by the General Court, that proposal had not been tabled by a delegation from a Member State, but originated with the Commission itself.