What is the translation of " IT DOES NOT PRECLUDE " in Slovenian?

• ne nasprotuje temu
• ne izključuje
• ne preprečuje
• ne nasprotuje

Examples of using It does not preclude in English and their translations into Slovenian

Another undoubted advantage of this diet program is the fact that it does not preclude the exercise.
Ena nedvomno prednost tega prehrane programa je dejstvo, da ne nasprotuje temu, da vajo.

Moreover, it does not preclude the use of funds from outside the EU, such as from the International Monetary Fund.
Poleg tega ne izključuje uporabe sredstev iz skladov zunaj EU, npr. Mednarodnega denarnega sklada.

And now we have I-Think-I'm-Jewish. which is a new one for the class, Oliver, so thanks for that. But it does not preclude you from giving us a morning prayer.
Zdaj imamo še"mislim, da sem Žid", kar je novost za razred, za kar se ti zahvaljujem, vendar to ne pomeni, da ne moreš voditi jutranje molitve.

Com is not a malignant program, it does not preclude the possibility that it is used by cyber criminals.
Com ne maligna program, ne izključuje možnosti, da ga uporabljajo kiber kriminalci.

It does not preclude, however, participation in other competitions run by the DLV, such as those that take place at regional level.
Ni pa jim onemogočena udeležba na drugih tekmovanjih, ki jih organizira DLV, na primer na tistih na regionalni ravni.

Although the form of words used does not expressly provide for the possibility of imposing general data retention obligations, it must be observed that it does not preclude that possibility either.
Čeprav s to formulacijo ni izrecno določena možnost sprejetja splošne obveznosti hrambe podatkov, je treba ugotoviti, da ji niti ne nasprotuje.

It does not preclude Member States from providing higher-level safeguards for protecting personal data than those established in the framework decision.
Državam članicam ne preprečuje sprejetja višjih zaščitnih ukrepov za varstvo osebnih podatkov od tistih, ki jih določa ta okvirni sklep.

Underlines, at the same time, that this principle does not prevent the achievement of social and cultural objectives and that it does not preclude the need to adapt EU law outside the AVMS Directive;
Hkrati poudarja, da to načelo ne izključuje doseganja socialnih in kulturnih ciljev in ne izključuje potrebe po prilagoditvi zakonodaje EU zunaj okvira direktive o avdiovizualnih medijskih storitvah;

Furthermore, it does not preclude taking into account differing physical characteristics and architectural features of electronic communications networks of relevance for other objectives of the framework.
Poleg tega ne izključuje upoštevanja različnih fizičnih in arhitekturnih lastnosti elektronskih komunikacijskih omrežij, ki so pomembne za druge cilje okvira.

If the conditions set out in Article 7(1) of Directive 2004/38 are not satisfied, Article 21 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude Mrs Alokpa from being refused a right of residence in Luxembourg.
Če pogoji iz člena 7(1) Direktive 2004/38 niso izpolnjeni, je treba člen 21 PDEU razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da se D. A. Alokpa zavrne pravica do prebivanja na luksemburškem ozemlju.

Must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a Member State from adopting rules imposing conditions relating to the frequency of calving and the length of suckling on producers wishing to qualify for the suckler cow premium.
Gati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica sprejme predpis, ki rejcem, ki želijo pridobiti premijo za kravo dojiljo, določa pogoje, ki se nana�ajo na pogostost telitve in trajanje dojenja.

(2) the envisaged agreement is incompatible with Articles 7, 8 and 21 and Article 52(1) of the Charter in so far as it does not preclude the transfer of sensitive data from the European Union to Canada and the use and retention of that data;
Sporazum med Kanado in Evropsko unijo o prenosu in obdelavi podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih namreč ni združljiv s členi 7, 8 in 21 ter členom 52(1) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah v delu, v katerem ne izključuje prenosa občutljivih podatkov iz Evropske unije v Kanado ter uporabe in hrambe teh podatkov.

Article 9 of Directive 98/5, although it does not preclude appeal proceedings being brought before a body which is not a court or tribunal, does not provide that a legal remedy may be open to the person concerned only after all other remedies have been exhausted.
Čeprav člen 9 Direktive 98/5 ne izključuje, da je najprej treba vložiti pravno sredstvo pred zunajsodnim organom, pa tudi ne predvideva, da je sodna pot zadevni osebi lahko na voljo šele po tem, ko je morebiti izrabila drugačna pravna sredstva.

The Agreement between Canada and the European Union on the transfer and processing of Passenger Name Record data is incompatible with Articles 7, 8 and 21 and Article 52(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union in so far as it does not preclude the transfer of sensitive data from the European Union to Canada and the use and retention of that data.
Sporazum med Kanado in Evropsko unijo o prenosu in obdelavi podatkov iz evidence podatkov o potnikih namreč ni združljiv s členi 7, 8 in 21 ter členom 52(1) Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah v delu, v katerem ne izključuje prenosa občutljivih podatkov iz Evropske unije v Kanado ter uporabe in hrambe teh podatkov.

Whether that constitutes a general rule(as L& D asserts) or not, it does not preclude the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance from drawing the conclusions which they did on the basis that a large market share is not acquired overnight. 78.
Vpra�anje, ali je to splo�no pravilo(kot trdi družba L& D) ali ne, odboru za pritožbe in Sodi�ču prve stopnje ne preprečuje, da bi sprejela ugotovitve, kot sta jih sprejela na podlagi tega, da si velikega tržnega deleža ni mogoče pridobiti čez noč. 78.

However, it does not preclude the presentation of consolidated financial statements complying with International Accounting Standards and financial statements of the parent company under national requirements within the same document, as long as the basis of preparation of each is clearly disclosed in the statement of accounting policies.
Vendar ne izključuje predstavljanja skupinskih računovodskih izkazov, skladnih z mednarodnimi računovodskimi standardi, in računovodskih izkazov obvladujoče družbe po zahtevah v državi v okviru iste listine, če je podlaga za pripravo vsakega med njimi jasno razkrita v izjavi o računovodskih usmeritvah.

Article 81 EC, Article 3(1)(g) EC, and the second paragraph of Article 10 EC, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national law which prohibits dental care providers, in the context of professional services or a dental surgery, from engaging in advertising of any kind of their services, whether directly or indirectly.
Povezane člene 81 ES, 3(1)(g) ES in 10, drugi odstavek, ES, je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotujejo nacionalnemu zakonu, ki ponudnikom zobozdravstvenih storitev v okviru svobodnega poklica oziroma zobozdravstvene ordinacije prepoveduje kakr�no koli neposredno ali posredno ogla�evanje svojih storitev.

It does not preclude national legislation which makes entry and residence for a national of a non-member country subject to conditions as to the nature or duration of dependency, provided that those conditions pursue a legitimate objective, are appropriate for securing the attainment of that objective and do not go beyond what is necessary to attain it..
Ne nasprotuje nacionalni zakonodaji, ki za vstop in prebivanje državljana tretje države predpiše pogoje glede vrste in trajanja vzdrževanja, če se s temi pogoji uresničuje legitimen cilj, če so primerni za zagotovitev uresničitve tega cilja in če ne presegajo tistega, kar je nujno za njegovo uresničitev.

The principle of technological neutrality enshrined in the EU regulatory framework means that regulation should neither impose nor discriminate in favour of the use of a particular type of technology, but it does not preclude a Member State from taking proportionate steps to promote specific technologies for transmission of digital television as a means for increasing spectrum efficiency13.
Načelo tehnološke nevtralnosti, poudarjeno v ureditvenem okviru EU, pomeni, da ureditev ne sme niti nalagati niti diskriminirati uporabo določene vrste tehnologije, vendar državi članici ne preprečuje, da sprejme sorazmerne ukrepe za pospeševanje določenih tehnologij za prenos digitalne televizije kot sredstva za povečanje učinkovitosti spektra13.

Directive 2003/9 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude, where the accommodation facilities specifically for asylum seekers are overloaded, the Member States from referring the asylum seekers to bodies within the general public assistance system, provided that that system ensures that the minimum standards laid down in that directive as regards the asylum seekers are met.
Direktivo 2003/9 je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje ureditvi, v skladu s katero lahko država članica v primeru polne zasedenosti objektov za nastanitev prosilcev za azil slednje napoti na organe sistema splošne javne pomoči, če je prosilcem za azil pri tem zagotovljeno spoštovanje minimalnih standardov iz te direktive.

In the version amended and updated by Regulation No 307/1999, is to be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a Member State whose social legislation is alone applicable to a resident selfemployed worker, from excluding from the tax base for contributions such as the General Social Contribution and the Social Debt Repayment Contribution income earned by the worker in another.
Je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica, katere zakonodaja na področju socialne varnosti velja za samozaposlenega delavca rezidenta, iz osnove za prispevke, kot sta splo�ni socialni prispevek in prispevek za povračilo socialnega dolga, izvzame dohodke, ki jih navedeni delavec prejema v drugi državi članici.

Ð Furthermore, it does not preclude taking into account that certain transmission media have physical characteristics and architectural features that can be superior in terms of quality of service, capacity, maintenance cost, energy efficiency, management flexibility, reliability, robustness and scalability, and ultimately in terms of performance, which can be reflected in actions taken in view of pursuing the various regulatory objectives. ï.
Ð Poleg tega ne izključuje upoštevanja dejstva, da imajo nekateri mediji za prenos podatkov fizične in arhitekturne lastnosti, ki so lahko boljše v smislu kakovosti storitve, zmogljivosti, stroškov vzdrževanja, energijske učinkovitosti, prožnosti pri uporabi, zanesljivosti, vzdržljivosti in nadgradljivosti, pa tudi v smislu delovanja, kar se lahko odraža pri ukrepih, sprejetih za izpolnjevanje različnih regulativnih ciljev. ï.

Article 5(3)(n) of Directive 2001/29, read in conjunction with Article 5(2)(c) of that directive, must be interpreted to mean that it does not preclude Member States from granting to publicly accessible libraries covered by those provisions the right to digitise the works contained in their collections, if such act of reproduction is necessary for the purpose of making those works available to users, by means of dedicated terminals, within those establishments.
Člen 5(3)(n) Direktive 2001/29 v povezavi s členom 5(2)(c) te direktive je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da država članica javno dostopnim knjižnicam iz te določbe prizna pravico, da digitalizirajo dela iz svojih zbirk, če je to dejanje reproduciranja potrebno, da se dajo ta dela uporabnikom na voljo na posebnih terminalih v prostorih te institucije.

(3) Regulation No 2201/2003 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the option for a court of a Member State with jurisdiction pursuant to Article 10 of that regulation to adopt any measure to ensure the return of the child following a judgment of non-return given pursuant to the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction.
Uredbo št. 2201/2003 je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje možnosti, da sodišče države članice, pristojno na podlagi člena 10 zadevne uredbe, sprejme vse ukrepe za zagotovitev vrnitve otroka po sprejetju odločbe, da se otrok ne vrne, na podlagi Haaške konvencije z dne 25. oktobra 1980 o civilnopravnih vidikih mednarodne ugrabitve otrok.

I therefore propose that the answer to the third question be that Article 15(1) of Directive 2000/31 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a host provider from being ordered to remove information equivalent to the information characterised as illegal, provided that a removal obligation does not entail general monitoring of the information stored, and is the consequence of awareness resulting from the notification made by the person concerned, third parties or another source.
Zato predlagam, da se na tretje vprašanje za predhodno odločanje odgovori, da je treba člen 15(1) Direktive 2000/31 razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da bi bil ponudnik storitev spletnega gostovanja obvezan odstraniti podatke, enakovredne tistemu, ki je bil označen za nezakonitega, ker obveznost odstranitve ne pomeni splošnega nadzora shranjenih podatkov, temveč izhaja iz seznanjenosti zaradi obvestila, ki ga pošlje zadevna oseba ali tretje osebe ali drug vir.

European Union law must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national court from assessing, prior to disapplying a national provision, whether a provision of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union is‘clear', provided that that requirement does not hinder the national courts in exercising the powers of interpretation and disapplication assigned to them under European Union law.
Da je pravo Unije treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da nacionalno sodišče, preden nacionalne določbe ne uporabi, presodi, ali je določba Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah„jasna“, če ta zahteva ne oteži izvajanja pristojnosti razlage in neuporabe, ki ju pravo Unije nalaga nacionalnim sodnim organom.

Article 4(7) of Regulation No 1370/2007 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the contracting authority from setting at 70% the proportion of self-provision by the operator responsible for the administration and performance of a contract for public passenger transport by bus, such as that at issue in the main proceedings.
Člen 4(7) Uredbe št. 1370/2007 je treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da naročnik izvajalcu, ki mu je naloženo upravljanje in izvedba javne storitve avtobusnega potniškega prevoza, kot je storitev v postopku v glavni stvari, določi 70 odstotni delež samostojne izvedbe.

In short, I believe that Union law must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude a national court from assessing, prior to disapplying a national provision, whether a provision of the Charter is‘clear', provided that that requirement does not hinder the national courts in exercising the powers of interpretation and disapplication assigned to them under Union law.
Skratka menim, da je pravo Unije treba razlagati tako, da ne nasprotuje temu, da nacionalno sodišče, preden nacionalne določbe ne uporabi, presodi, ali je določba Listine Evropske unije o temeljnih pravicah„jasna“, če ta zahteva ne oteži izvajanja pristojnosti razlage in neuporabe, ki ju pravo Unije nalaga nacionalnim sodnim organom.

Accordingly, it is my opinion that Article 50 of the Charter must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude the Member States from bringing criminal proceedings relating to facts in respect of which a final penalty has already been imposed in administrative proceedings relating to the same conduct, provided that the criminal court is in a position to take into account the prior existence of an administrative penalty for the purposes of mitigating the punishment to be imposed by it..
Zato menim, da je treba člen 50 Listine razlagati tako, da državam članicam ne preprečuje uvedbe kazenskega postopka za ista dejanja, za katera je bila že v upravnem postopku z dokončno odločbo naložena sankcija, če kazensko sodišče upošteva že izrečeno upravno sankcijo, da bi tako omililo kazen, ki bi jo sicer izreklo.

It did not preclude the application of the export refund system for agricultural products applicable in the EU.
Nadalje ne preprečujejo uporabe sistema izvoznih nadomestil, ki se uporabljajo pri izvozu kmetijskih izdelkov v skladu z določbami sporazuma.