Примеры использования Claimant provided evidence на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The claimant provided evidence that Zarslink had imported equipment into Kuwait during July 1990.
In regard to the remaining five debts totalling KWD 10,800, the claimant provided evidence of debt collection efforts.
The claimant provided evidence that the contract dated 13 March 1990 was to be completed by 15 August 1990.
In response to requests under article 34 of the Rules for further information in respect of these claims, the claimant provided evidence that four of the six contracts were not resumed following the liberation of Kuwait.
In addition, the claimant provided evidence that certain amounts had been collected following the liberation of Kuwait.
Люди также переводят
The individual claimant whose claim was identified as overlapping with the"E4" claimant Al Ajami Co. for Mechanical Instruments W.L.L. and the"E4" claimant provided evidence in the form of insurance records and financial statements, respectively.
The claimant provided evidence that it had contracted the management of its operations to a German company during the period from 1975 to 1987.
In respect of the claim by Al Towaijri for unbilled contract expenses,the Panel notes that the claimant provided evidence that it was party to a contract with the Kuwaiti National Housing Authority(the"NHA") for the construction of houses at the Al-Qurain Housing Project.
The claimant provided evidence that its insurer contested liability under the war risks insurance policy that covered the claimant's barge.
Two individual claimants whose claims were identified as overlapping with the"E4" claimant International Engineering Construction and the"E4" claimant provided evidence in the form of vehicle registration certificates, schedules of inventory, contract and vehicles and financial statements.
The claimant provided evidence of 10 previous remittances made from its Iraqi bank account to the United States between January 1985 and March 1990.
In support of its claim, the claimant provided evidence relating to the value of its stock at the date of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The claimant provided evidence that prior to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, the proposed shareholders were incurring costs in the name of the as-yet-unestablished company.
In support of these losses, the claimant provided evidence such as financial statements for 1987 to 1990, purchase invoices and drop registration certificates.
The claimant provided evidence that prior to Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait it had retained a contractor to design and construct a residential and commercial complex.
During the on-site inspection, the Claimant provided evidence in relation to payments made to Gama Services Limited("Gama"), which was contracted during the relevant period to manage King Fahd Hospital in Riyadh.
The claimant provided evidence that although Zarslink had imported certain equipment into Kuwait during July 1990, it had not yet commenced operations as at 2 August 1990.
In respect of the claim for unbilled contract expenses by Refrigeration Industries, the claimant provided evidence that it entered into two agreements with the Kuwaiti Ministry of Electricity and Water to supply air-conditioning units to the same schools project as described above in respect of Gulf Engineering. Refrigeration Industries provided evidence that, pursuant to two contracts dated 14 April 1990, the claimant had installed air-conditioning units at the school sites prior to 2 August 1990.
The claimant provided evidence as to the costs it would have incurred in the normal course, together with evidence of the actual increased costs incurred to complete the project.
The claimant provided evidence that it imported a shipment of cigarettes in May 1990 under a letter of credit and that these goods were received by the claimant and shipped to its customer.
The claimant provided evidence that following the liberation of Kuwait, it incurred costs to raise the barge but that upon raising the barge, it determined that the barge had been damaged beyond repair.
The claimant provided evidence that as a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, the goods could not be delivered to Kuwait and were instead returned to the supplier.
The claimant provided evidence of the contracts but only provided evidence to support an outstanding receivable owed by a Kuwaiti individual in respect of work done pursuant to one of the contracts.
The claimant provided evidence that it had retained a contractor to prepare land for agricultural production by performing such works as removing desert sand, backfilling soil and preparing roads and tracks.
The claimant provided evidence that the barge was damaged as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait and that the claimant entered into an agreement with a contractor in April 1991 to repair such damage at a cost of USD 8.3 million.
Furthermore, although the claimant provided evidence that its master films were stolen or destroyed, the claimant did not provide evidence that its film rights were lost or that it was unable to re-secure the film rights after Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
Although the claimant provided evidence of the existence of the expenses and recorded an extraordinary loss in its post-liberation balance sheet, it did not provide any evidence that the loss was a direct result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait.
The Panel notes that the claimant provided evidence demonstrating that its 78 vehicles were in Jordan during Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait and that it was liable to pay the Government of Jordan JOD 100 per month for such vehicles while they were in Jordan.
The claimant provided evidence that a certain percentage(usually 5 or 10 per cent) of the contract value would be withheld by the customer until construction was completed and the claimant could return to the site to complete the final commissioning of the air-conditioning units.
The claimant provided evidence that the partner received the two shipments but shortly thereafter, as a result of Iraq's invasion and occupation of Kuwait, all effective methods of communication between Iraq and Saudi Arabia ceased, and the claimant could not discover the fate of the two shipments.