Примеры использования Complainant also claims на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant also claims that bomb attacks were carried out in Khuzestan in 2005.
They both claim that they have been tortured by the Taliban and the first complainant also claims to have been tortured by the Afghan police.
The complainant also claims that the danger for Tien Tao practitioners in China is serious.
The complainant also claims to have been convicted of attempted murder and sentenced to eight years' imprisonment.
The complainant also claims that no amnesty has been granted to those arrested many of whom have been killed or have disappeared.
The complainant also claims that his credibility and trustworthiness were put in doubt by his lawyer, who was provided by Legal Aid Canada.
The complainant also claims to be the victim of violations of article 2(para. 1), and of articles 6, 7, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, read in conjunction with article 1.
The complainant also claims that his rights under article 14 of the Convention were violated, as the authorities did not offer him redress and adequate compensation, including rehabilitation.
The complainant also claims to have been subjected to"table torture", in which he was stripped, made to lie flat on his back or stomach on a long table, with his arms and legs tied down, and was then beaten.
The complainant also claims to have been subjected to the"chair" torture, in which the victim is stripped and tied to a chair, with his hands behind his back, and beaten across the face, chest and abdomen.
The complainant also claims that, in fact, no appropriate investigation was carried out in his case, since police officers, i.e. interested persons, failed to conduct a comprehensive investigation.
The complainant also claims that a case is pending against him under a"Haddood ordinance", with a potential punishment of"14 years' rigorous imprisonment" and"30 stripes.
The complainant also claims that he risked being placed in solitary confinement, sentenced to death, despite the assurances given, and being subjected to a lengthy period of detention on death row.
The complainant also claims that his freedom of movement and his right to work were infringed by the administrative supervision measures applied against him, as was his right to pursue his studies.
The complainant also claims that he was subjected to"chair" torture, in which the victim is forced to kneel and to hold a chair as high as possible above his head, and is then whipped whenever he starts to lower the chair.
The complainant also claims that no prompt, impartial and effective investigation was carried out into his allegations of torture and that those responsible have not been prosecuted, in violation of articles 12 and 13 of the Convention.
The complainant also claims that, in his current situation, if he is returned to Sri Lanka, he would be killed or harmed by the LTTE for having divulged information on the process by which he illegally obtained a tourist visa to enter Australia.
The complainant also claims to have been tortured in the"upside-down" position whereby the victim is stripped, hands tied behind his back and suspended from the ceiling by a rope tied to one or both of his feet, with his head hanging downwards.
The complainant also claims to have been tortured in the"upside-down" position, whereby the victim is stripped, hands tied behind his back and suspended from the ceiling by a rope tied to one or both of his feet, with his head hanging downwards.
The complainant also claims that no prompt, impartial and effective investigation has been carried out into his allegations of torture, that those responsible have not been prosecuted and that he and his family received threats and were subject to intimidation, in violation of articles 12 and 13 of the Convention.
The complainant also claims that the incidents which occurred in his family, including the fact that two of his close relatives were murdered and two of his brothers were forced to seek asylum abroad, corroborate the fact that the authorities were looking for him and as he could not be found took their revenge on his family.
The complainant also claims a violation of his rights under article 3, paragraph 2, of the Convention owing to the lack of investigation into his case by the Danish authorities, notably their failure to conduct a medical examination, and the lack of reasoning regarding the risk of torture, if returned to Turkey, in the decisions of the Appeals Board.
The complainant also claims that the elections in 2001, where the Awami League was replaced by the Bangladesh Nationalist Party(the BNP), did not constitute such a fundamental change in the political circumstances in Bangladesh that the grounds for persecution no longer exist; and that people who had been falsely accused or charged on account of their political activities were acquitted of these accusations or charges.
The complainant also claimed that if he were to be extradited to Algeria, he would be at risk of being tortured, in violation of article 3 of the Convention.
Moreover, during the domestic proceedings, the complainant also claimed that he had been tortured in Lebanon in 1989.
Counsel also claims that the complainant has exhausted all domestic remedies.
The State party also claims that the complainant's account of the events in Azerbaijan contain a number of inconsistencies, primarily with regard to his position on the staff of the Musavat newspaper, and that the complainant's story concerning the beatings and the importance of his political activities have escalated both during the course of his asylum application and before the Committee.
They also claimed that the first complainant was HIV-positive and would not be able to receive anti-viral drugs in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.
The State party contested the admissibility of the communication on the basis that the domestic remedies had not been exhausted; it also considered that the complainant had not substantiated his claims.
As to his claim about the violence inflicted by the Afghan authorities, the Committee also notes that the complainant claims that the State party based its assessment about the credibility of his claim on the divergent statements he gave within the asylum proceedings, that his statement's inconsistency stemmed from inadequate language interpretation, and that he was unable to check it since he is illiterate.