Примеры использования Complainant stresses на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant stresses that the victim was in very good health before being imprisoned at Mechraâ-Sfa gendarmerie.
Regarding the so-called"demonstrable absence of risks in the event of his return to Tunisia", the complainant stresses that he frequently has to call his counsel from a public telephone booth.
The complainant stresses that CUDP members in Ethiopia are the victims of regular clampdowns and persecution by the authorities.
Furthermore, the complainant considers that the application for revocation does not have suspensive effect.In this regard, the complainant stresses that the law is silent on the issue and that the extradition order was signed by the State party's competent authorities while the application for revocation was in progress.
The complainant stresses that she did indeed make a complaint to the domestic courts, through her Tunisian counsel.
Regarding the current situation in Mexico, the complainant stresses that there is total impunity for soldiers and police officers who commit offences against the population.
The complainant stresses that he does not simply need medical care in Haiti: he needs there to be Medtronic equipment in Haiti.
With regard to the situation in Honduras, the complainant stresses that, although a democratic regime now exists, the military is still a"sub-State.
The complainant stresses that on numerous occasions since submitting his communication to the Committee he has, through his counsel, written multiple letters to the Moroccan authorities, including the King of Morocco, the Prime Minister, the Minister of Justice, the Minister for Foreign Affairs, the private secretary of the Minister of Justice, and the Office of Criminal Affairs and Pardons, asking for the confirmation of their intention to suspend his brother's extradition.
The complainant stresses that all international stakeholders have denounced the abuses carried out by Togolese law enforcement personnel during the 2005 presidential elections.
The complainant stresses that his financial hardship was known to the authorities, since he was permitted neither to work nor to receive social assistance.
The complainant stresses that the police operation launched on that day was mounted following careful preparation and planning, i.e. it was not a"spontaneous" police operation.
The complainant stresses that he is not just any member but a founding member of JEM and well known throughout Sudan due to his activities.
The complainant stresses that the fact that she was not arrested on arrival in Spain, nor interrogated by the security forces, was due to her very poor state of health after 31 days of hunger strike.
The complainant stresses that Morocco has not signed a readmission agreement with Senegal and, as a result, the Moroccan authorities decided simply to return him to Mauritania without informing the Mauritanian authorities.
The complainant stresses that, like other victims of torture, he was given no opportunity in the examination proceedings and the trial to describe his experiences of torture or to denounce those responsible.
The complainant stresses that when the Chinese authorities made Falun Gong illegal in 1999, his Falun Gong materials were confiscated by the police, who threatened to close the clothing business he had opened in his home village.
As to the causal link between the uncontested traumatic events of 1998 andher escape in 2008, the complainant stressed that she had clearly not based her asylum request on these events alone but rather on the continuous intimidations, surveillance, arrests and molestations by security forces from the time her sister had started her illegal activities until the complainant finally fled Turkey in 2008.
During the first asylum proceedings, the complainants contended that the police had searched their house and the shop only once, whereas during the second asylum proceedings, the second complainant stressed that the police had visited their house on several occasions.
The complainants stress that the Committee itself, when considering the third periodic report of the United Kingdom concerning the Pinochet case, recommended"initiating criminal proceedings in England, in the event that the decision is made not to extradite him.
Lastly, with regard to the FIDH document submitted by the complainant, the State party stresses that it refers to human rights advocates, something which the complainant cannot claim to be.
The complainant further stresses that he never voluntarily confessed his guilt during the preliminary investigation or in court.
The complainant further stresses that all the requests for provisional release submitted by his lawyers have been dismissed or simply never examined.
The complainant also stresses that the prohibition of torture and inhuman or degrading treatment is a provision which admits of no exception, including for terrorists.
The complainant also stresses that the strike by the staff of Prince Regent Charles Hospital drew attention to the abuse to which he was being subjected.
The complainant further stresses that the State party has not addressed her claim that she was given misguiding advice by the migration agent before benefitting from legal counsel to prepare her protection visa application.
The State party stresses that the complainant has offered no serious reason for his failure to take action despite the legal and practical opportunities open to him to bring his case before the national courts.
The complainant also stresses that the main witnesses to the incident, namely the other persons arrested and imprisoned under the same circumstances as the victim, have never been asked by investigators about the facts of the case or the conditions of their detention.
The State party regrets that the absolute statute of limitations for criminal prosecution in the present case has expired on 8 June 2006 and stresses that the complainant himself has partly contributed to the slowing down of the investigation.
The State party also stresses that the allegations made by the complainant during the first Embassy visit did not amount, in its view, to torture within the meaning of the Convention.