Примеры использования Emergency courts на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Emergency courts are prohibited.
The formation of emergency courts is prohibited.
It is abnormal, in the Working Group's view, that these emergency courts should.
The establishment of emergency courts is prohibited in the country.
Article 148(2) of the Constitution prohibits the formation of emergency courts.
The formation of emergency courts is prohibited arts. 148 and 149, EC.
Principle 47: Repeal of emergency legislation and abolition of emergency courts.
The establishment of emergency courts shall be prohibited EC, arts. 148, 149.
Principle 47: Repeal of emergency legislation and abolition of emergency courts.
The creation of emergency courts and other structures for dispensing justice is prohibited Constitution, arts. 97 and 98.
That debate often arises in relation to emergency courts and military tribunals.
AI called on the Government to stop referring security related cases involving civilians to military or emergency courts.
Recently only very few civilians were referred to military or emergency courts and the normal criminal code was applied.
Palestine was particularly encouraged by Djibouti's decision to abolish the death penalty and asked if, in the same vein,the Government has abolished emergency courts.
Repeal of all emergency laws, abolition of emergency courts and recognition of the inviolability and non-derogability of habeas corpus; and.
The institution of any forms or types of emergency courts and the application of any forms and types of summary or emergency judicial proceedings shall not be allowed.
The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention also commented on the practice of several countriesin establishing special courts, including emergency courts, revolutionary courts, military courts, people's courts, or courts of State security.
At the same time, Djibouti abolished emergency courts including the High Court of Justice and the Court of State Security, which tried political offences and embezzlement of public funds by officials.
Under articles 97 and 98, that right is safeguarded and guaranteed to all; the State must ensure access to judicial bodies for litigants and work for the speedy settlement of cases; no administrative action or decision is immune from judicial oversight;no person may be tried other than before a natural judge; and emergency courts are prohibited.
In September 2005 announced the end of the state of emergency and dismantled the emergency courts but soon promulgated a new judiciary act, which continued many of the practices of the emergency courts.
This results in profound transformations of(i) basic criminal law, affecting the qualification of persons, offences and the scale of punishments;(ii) procedure, affecting the remedy of habeas corpus and guarantees of a fair trial, and(iii) standards of jurisdictional competence,with recourse to military tribunals or emergency courts, or even non-judicial proceedings.
In view of events throughout 2007, the Working Group reiterates its concerns over deprivation of liberty occurring during states of emergency and over recourse to military,special or emergency courts, especially in the context of countering terrorism, and recalls some of the applicable international human rights norms and standards which must be adhered to at all times.
The emergency courts are therefore removed whenever the political situation in the country is stable, as in fact occurred after the end of the Iran-Iraq war, when several emergency decrees were revoked, although the country was obliged to put several of them into effect again following the aggression of the Coalition States and the situation created by the economic embargo against Iraq.
In its previous reports, the Working Group noted that, in its experience, the main causes of arbitrary detentions were the exercise of the powers pertaining to states of emergency, the lack of proportionality between the alleged emergency and decisions of the authorities, the vague description of the acts to be punished andthe existence of special or emergency courts.
However, another issue of concern for the Working Group remains the continuing tendency towards deprivation of liberty by States abusing states of emergency or derogation, invoking special powers specific to states of emergency without formal declaration, having recourse to military,special or emergency courts, not observing the principle of proportionality between the severity of the measures taken and the situation concerned, and employing vague definitions of offences allegedly designed to protect State security and combat terrorism.
The law stipulates: the circumstances under which a state of emergency may be proclaimed; the authority competent to proclaim it; the procedures for extending a state of emergency; the measures that may be adopted;the conditions bringing a complaint relating to the state of emergency; emergency courts and their procedures; and the effects of ending a state of emergency.
An emergency court was established and prosecutors appointed.
On 25 November 2004, the State Security Emergency Court issued a second decision ordering the release of Mr. ElDerini case No. 35961/2004.
None the less,certain principles can be applied in any court- whether it be an emergency court, a military tribunal, a juvenile court, etc.