Примеры использования Expected military на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The obligation to respect proportionality between the expected military advantage and the incidental damage to the environment.
In this connection the Israeli Government immediately launched an information campaign to support the expected military operation.
The proportionality assessment may well be that the expected military advantage outweighs the expected civilian damage.
In relation to the expected military gain, one response indicates that the greater the importance of the military target, the greater the collateral damage allowed.
The flights, averaging three daily,reportedly increase to up to five or more per day in advance of expected military engagements.
Additional information on the impact of the expected military build-up on the fragile water and sanitation systems is contained in section III above.
The principle of proportionality is also a core element,prohibiting attacks that are anticipated to harm civilians excessively in relation to the expected military advantage.
As noted above,the 2014/15 financial period corresponds with phase III of the expected military drawdown, which will allow for the closure of a number of military camps and locations.
Proportionality- the principle of proportionality requires that the collateral civilian losses resulting from a military action should not be excessive in relation to the expected military advantage.
In light of this, the anticipated incidental harm to civilians was low and the expected military advantage of the strike-- targeting terrorist operatives involved in the launching of rockets towards Israel-- was high.
The construction sector in particular, an important contributor to the economy, is expected to see rapid growth in the coming years,particularly with the expected military expansion.
However, if the same expected military advantage could be gained by the use of weapons not expected to cause ERW, it may be possible to mount an argument to the effect that the deployment of a weapon which produces ERW causes unnecessary suffering and is in violation of the prohibition.
The law requires the cancelling of an attack when it becomes apparent that the target is civilian orthat the civilian loss would be disproportionate to the expected military gain.
The proportionality test obligates military planners to take account of all expected consequences for the civilian population to be sure that the expected military advantage is significant enough to justify the anticipated incidental civilian loss of life.
Mexico therefore called on the High Contracting Parties during the present Review Conference to remain faithful to the objective of stopping the use of weapons that caused excessive injuries orhad indiscriminate effects, regardless of their expected military benefits.
The civilian losses resulting from the military action would therefore be patently excessive in relation to the expected military advantage of killing rebels or putting them hors de combat.
The commander should withhold the attack or abort it upon realising that his is a non-military target, and that his action is likely to inflict unintended losses on the civilian population orcause damage to civilian property, both disproportionate to the expected military gains.
Timothy McCormack argued that since both the longer term and short term expected military advantage will be considered prior to attack it is reasonable to insist that the expected longer term as well as the expected short term damage to civilian populations should also be considered.
The implication here, for example, is that for some Respondent States, cluster munitions are such a militarily effective weapon that any expected oranticipated problem of ERW from dud submunitions does not outweigh the expected military advantage from their use.
But the important issue here is that the expected civilian damage must be taken into account-- that it is unacceptable for the expected military advantage to be based on a longer timeframe while limiting the expected quantification of civilian damage only to the immediate effects of the attack itself.
In the particular circumstances of this case, the MAG determined that the use of these munitions was needed to protect Israeli forces from Hamas operatives armed with anti-tank missiles and complied with the requirement of proportionality, as the anticipated risk to civilians andcivilian objects stemming from their use was not excessive in relation to the expected military advantage.
The parties to an armed conflict must do everything feasible to minimize the loss of civilian life and damage to civilian property,including in some circumstances to cancel an attack if new information has come to light about the error of the expected military advantage to be gained or new information that has come to light before the attack occurs of a greater number of civilians in the general area than was otherwise thought.
US authorities determined that there had been no violation of international humanitarian law because the information available at the time had allowed the military commander to make a reasonable assessment that the target was a legitimate military objective and that the expected loss of civilian life and/ ordamage to civilian property was not disproportionate to the expected military advantage.
These cases also raise questions regarding IDF respect for the basic provisions of international law when planning and carrying out an attack; these provisions include those relating to the distinction between civilians and combatants and between civilian objects and military targets,proportionality between the expected military advantage of the attack in relation to potential injury to civilians, and the need to take precautions when evaluating the effects of the attack and choosing the weapons to be used.
However, military planners and commanders are obviously going to take into account not just the expected short-term military advantage but also the longer-term military advantage.
Expected longer term military advantage.
Expected accomplishment 1.2: Military stabilization of Ituri.
Expected full deployment of military contingent personnel.
A former UNMIS Force Commander acknowledged in May 2010 that the international community expected the military component of the Mission to do more on protection of civilians.
Instead, they are expected to measure the expected loss of civilian life anddamage to civilian property against the expected direct military advantage to be gained.