Примеры использования Frontier dispute на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Frontier dispute Benin/Niger.
Counsel and Advocate for Benin in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute 2002-2005.
Frontier Dispute Burkina Faso/Niger.
Judge ad hoc at the International Court of Justice in the Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger) case 2002-2005.
Frontier Dispute Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali.
On 20 July 2010, Burkina Faso andNiger jointly submitted a frontier dispute between them to the Court.
Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Niger)(see paras. 165-169 below);
Finally, on 20 July 2010, Burkina Faso andNiger jointly submitted a frontier dispute between them to the Court.
In the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Niger), Burkina Faso chose Jean-Pierre Cot to sit as judge ad hoc.
Under the terms of article 1 of that Special Agreement, the parties had agreed to submit their frontier dispute to the Court.
Counsel and Advocate for Burkina Faso in the Frontier Dispute case(Burkina Faso versus Mali) Judgment of 22 December 1986.
President Higgins introduced him to Judges Ranjeva, Abraham and Bennouna,who sat in the Chamber which dealt with the case concerning the Frontier Dispute Benin/Niger.
Judge ad hoc in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali), before a Chamber of the International Court of Justice.
It is binding on the parties andthus brings legal closure to the frontier dispute between the two countries.
In the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Niger), Burkina Faso chose Jean-Pierre Cot and the Niger chose Ahmed Mahiou to sit as judges ad hoc.
On 12 July 2005, the Chamber of the Court formed to deal with the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger) rendered its Judgment.
In the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger), Benin chose Mr. Mohamed Bennouna and Niger Mr. Mohammed Bedjaoui to sit as judges ad hoc.
Under the terms of article 1 of this special agreement, the parties have agreed to submit their frontier dispute to the Court, and that each of them will choose a judge ad hoc.
In the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso v. Republic of Mali), the Court was careful to point out that"it all depends on the intention of the State in question.
By its order of 3 April 1985, the Court decided to accede to the request of the two Governments andformed a Chamber to deal with the case of the Frontier Dispute Burkina Faso/Mali.
Another aspect to be emphasized is that in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger), the parties decided to submit it to a Chamber of the Court rather than to the plenary Court.
The International Court of Justice had considered the legal scope of such acts Military and Paramilitary Activities in andagainst Nicaragua case or Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali) case.
The Court made in the case concerning Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger), an Order placing on record certain changes in the composition of the Chamber formed to deal with that case.
During the period under review, the Chamber of the Court formed to deal with the case concerning Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger), also held hearings and delivered its Judgment in the case.
The agreement of the new Nigerian authorities on 24 November 1998 to proceed to an exchange of prisoners of war between our two countries gave grounds for hope for a change of attitude in favour of a peaceful and jurisdictional settlement of the frontier dispute.
He was the President of the Chamber formed to deal with the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali, 1983-1986) and was President of the Court from 1994 to 1997.
The last two of these cases are new ones, and I should, in passing, like to take this opportunity to congratulate Benin and Niger on their decision, taken by joint agreement,to submit their frontier dispute to a chamber of the Court.
He was the President of the Chamber formed to deal with the case concerning the frontier dispute(Burkina Faso/Republic of Mali, 1983-1987), and was President of the Court from 1994 to 1997.
Uti possidetis, though initially applied in settling decolonization issues in America and Africa, is today recognised as a general principle,as stated by the International Court of Justice in its Judgment of 22 December 1986 in the case between Burkina Faso and Mali Frontier Dispute.
The President of the Chamber in the case concerning the Frontier Dispute(Benin/Niger) made two Orders, authorizing the submission of certain pleadings and fixing the timelimit for their filing.